Cor Vasa 2017, 59(3):e240-e245 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2016.12.002
Barriers in the implementation of guidelines for acute coronary syndromes. Focus on antiplatelet therapy
- a Kardiocentrum 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha, Česká republika
- b Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice, a.s., České Budějovice, Česká republika
- c I. interní klinika - kardiologická, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc, Olomouc, Česká republika
- d Kardiocentrum Nemocnice Podlesí, a.s., Třinec, Česká republika
- e Městská nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava, Česká republika
- f Institut biostatistiky a analýz Lékařské a Přírodovědecké fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, Brno, Česká republika
Aim: Modern treatment of acute coronary syndromes significantly improved outcomes of patients with this life-threatening disease. Especially the combination of timely interventional treatment with potent novel antiplatelet agents was proven to be effective in several randomized trials and is now recommended by guidelines worldwide. The aim of this study was to analyze how the guidelines are implemented in real life practice.
Methods and patients: Between 2013 and 2015 two complementary acute coronary syndrome registries were organized in the Czech Republic and included a total of 1967 patients. The ATHRO-II registry was done in 29 outpatient cardiology practices, focused on the prescription of antithrombotic drugs and enrolled 687 patients discharged home after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (with or without ST elevation). These patients were followed for 12 months. The CZECH-3 registry was done in 43 hospitals of all types (13 PCI capable and 30 non-PCI) and enrolled 1280 consecutive patients admitted for proven acute coronary syndrome during a period of 2 months, irrespective of treatment strategy and in-hospital outcome. These patients were followed for 30 days. Weighted average values were calculated for both cohorts combined. The mean age of all enrolled patients was 66 years, females presented 32% of study population, 21% had prior MI, 19% prior PCI and 7% prior and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Results: Prehospital aspirin was used in 51% of patients (i.e. majority of those arriving via emergency medical services), prehospital ticagrelor in 13% and clopidogrel in 16% of patients. Coronary angiography was performed in 94% of patients, PCI in 80% and CABG in 13%. Among stented patients the use of drug-eluting stents was only 69%, and 31% of stent were bare metal stents. There were major differences between PCI centers in DES proportion (36-78%). Discharge medication included aspirin in 93%, clopidogrel in 73%, ticagrelor in 14%, prasugrel in 4% and warfarin in 6%. Surprisingly, clopidogrel preference (over ticagrelor or prasugrel) was caused by economic reasons (patients refused to pay the price difference) only in 4% of those, who were put on aspirin + clopidogrel treatment. Contraindication of prasugrel or ticagrelor was present in 17% (including 5% of patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation). Among remaining 79% of patients who were treated by clopidogrel + aspirin (instead of more potent novel antiplatelet agents) the attending physicians were unable to explain the reason for not using the guidelines-recommended treatment.
Conclusions: The use of modern guidelines-recommended treatment (DES or novel antiplatelet agents) is surprisingly poor and is not limited by economic restrictions but rather by lack of guidelines knowledge or lack of physicians' activity to quickly implement the new guidelines.
Keywords: Acute coronary syndromes; Antiplatelet treatment; Clopidogrel; Guidelines; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Prasugrel; Ticagrelor
Received: October 27, 2016; Revised: December 8, 2016; Accepted: December 12, 2016; Published: June 1, 2017 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- M. Roffi, C. Patrono, J.P. Collet, et al., 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Journal 37 (2016) 267-315.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- E.A. Amsterdam, N.K. Wenger, R.G. Brindis, et al., 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 64 (2014) e139-e228.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- G.N. Levine, E.R. Bates, J.A. Bittl, et al., 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery, Circulation 134 (2016) e123-e155.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- J. Engel, N.L. Damen, I. van der Wulp, et al., Adherence to Cardiac Practice Guidelines in the Management of Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Literature Review, Current Cardiology Reviews 13 (2017) 3-27.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- S. Tickoo, A. Bhardwaj, G.C. Fonarow, et al., Relation between hospital length of stay and quality of care in patients with acute coronary syndromes (from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines - Coronary Artery Disease Data Set), American Journal of Cardiology 117 (2016) 201-205.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- H. Dores, C. Aguiar, J. Ferreira, et al., Compliance of pharmacological treatment for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes with contemporary guidelines: influence on outcomes, Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy 4 (2014) 13-20.
- P. Widimsky, V. Hricak, J. Jarkovsky, et al., Antiplatelet therapy in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. Comparison of the Czech and Slovak Republics results of the ATHRO registry, Cor et Vasa 56 (2014) e320-e324.
Go to original source...
- J.B. Wasserfallen, A. Berger, P. Eckert, et al., Impact of medical practice guidelines on the assessment of patients with acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST segment elevation, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 16 (2004) 383-389.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- K.H. Bønaa, J. Mannsverk, R. Wiseth, et al., Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for coronary artery disease, New England Journal of Medicine 375 (2016) 1242-1252.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- L. Wallentin, R.C. Becker, A. Budaj, et al., Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, New England Journal of Medicine 361 (2009) 1045-1057.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- S.D. Wiviott, E. Braunwald, C.H. McCabe, et al., Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, New England Journal of Medicine 357 (2007) 2001-2015.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...