Cor Vasa 2011, 53(10):547-551 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2011.135

Tanatril Prague BP Project

Jiří Krupička1,*, Jiří Widimský jr.2, Karel Chroust3
1 Kardiologická ambulance, Brandýs nad Labem, Česká republika
2 III. interní klinika, Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice a 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
3 Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská a Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno

Introduction: Treatment with long-acting antihypertensive medication prevents the blood pressure elevation in morning hours, thus decreasing the cardiovascular risk. We used ABPM to assess the effect of imidapril on 24-hour blood pressure control in a 10-week trial.

Materials and methods: 412 patients (52% men) aged > 18 years (21-89; mean: 58; median: 60) with mild to moderate hypertension were enrolled. Imidapril monotherapy was used in 302 patients (73%) (de novo treatment or switch from another), 65 patients (16%) received combination of imidapril with another antihypertensive drug and not enough data for assessment were available from 45 patients (11%). During 10 weeks, 3 follow-up visits with 2 ABPMs took place (second visit-conclusion). The data were obtained using a standardized form and the blood pressure including ABPM was monitored in a standard way according to the guidelines. The mean imidapril dose was 11 mg daily.

Results: Mean baseline blood pressure was 155/92 mmHg (median: 155/92) and it dropped to 132/80 mmHg by 8 weeks of treatment (median: 130/80 mmHg; p < 0.001 for both BP values). In newly diagnosed hypertonics, the blood pressure dropped from 153/92 mmHg (median: 155/90) to 132/81 mmHg (median: 130/80) (p < 0.001 for both values). In patients switched to imidapril from another antihypertensive medication, the blood pressure decreased from 155/92 mmHg (median: 155/95) to 134/79 mmHg (median: 135/80) (p < 0.001 for both values). Previously treated hypertonics showed blood pressure decrease from 161/95 mmHg (median: 160/95) to 131/78 mmHg (median: 130/80) (p < 0.001 for both values). Mean 24-hour blood pressure dropped from 141/83 to 127/76 (p < 0.001 for all measurements). As for the group treated with monotherapy (newly diagnosed patients or switch), the mean values also decreased significantly to those recommended for ABPM (from 138/82 to 126/76 and from 142/83 to 128/76 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.001 for all measurements) and the same significance level (p < 0.001) was observed for the changes of the daytime/nighttime mean values. In previously treated patients, the 24-hour mean value dropped from 145/84 to 128/75 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for both values). The treatment was withdrawn in 6 patients (1.5% of the entire population), all of which were treated with monotherapy. Dry cough was the reason for treatment withdrawal in half of them (0.8% of the entire population).

Conclusion: Treatment with imidapril - mean dose 11 mg once daily - lead to a very good 24-hour blood pressure control. This applied both to monotherapy (de novo treatment or switch from another) and to combinations with other antihypertensive medications. Dry irritative cough was observed in less than 1% of cases, confirming the low rates of this side effect described in other reports.

Keywords: Hypertension; Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; 24-hour control of hypertension; Long-acting medications

Published: October 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Krupička J, Widimský J, Chroust K. Tanatril Prague BP Project. Cor Vasa. 2011;53(10):547-551. doi: 10.33678/cor.2011.135.
Download citation

References

  1. 2007 Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines Committee. J Hypertens 2007;25:1105-1187.
  2. Widimský J, jr., Cífková R, Špinar J, Filipovský J, et al. Doporučení diagnostických a léčebných postupů u arteriální hypertenze - verze 2007. Doporučení České společnosti pro hypertenzi. Vnitř Lék 2008;54:101-110. Go to PubMed...
  3. Cífková R, Škodová Z, Lánská V, et al. Prevalence, awarness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the Czech Republic. Results of two nationwide cross-sectional surveys in 1997/1998 and 2000/2001, Czech post-MONICA study. J Hypertens 2004;18:571-579. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Cífková R, Škodová Z, Bruthans J, et al. Longitudinal trends in major cardiovascular risk factors in the Czech population between 1985 and 2007/8. Czech MONICA and Czech post-MONICA. Atherosclerosis 2010, doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.04.007 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Mancia G, Laurent S, Agabi-Rosei E, et al. Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension managment: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document. J Hypertens 2009;27:2121-2158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. O'Brien E, Pickering T,Asmar R, et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the EuropeanSociety of Hypertension International Protocol for Validation of Blood PressureMeasuring Devices in Adults. Blood Press Monit 2002;7:3-17. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. O'Brien E. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement is indispensable to good clinical practice. Hipertens riesgo vasc. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.hipert.2009.02.002. Go to original source...
  8. Mazzaglia G, Ambrosioni E, Alacqua M, et al. Adherence to antihypertensive medications and cardiovascular morbidity among newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Circulation 2009;120:1598-1605. Go to original source...
  9. Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Skeva II, et al. Assessment of drug effects on blood pressure and pulse pressure using clinic, home and ambulatory measurements. J Hum Hypertens 2002;16:729-735. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Cushman WC, Basile J. Achieving blood pressure goals: why aren't we? J Clin Hypertens 2006;8:865-872. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Staessen JA, Fagard RH, Lijnen PJ, et al. Mean and range of the ambulatory pressure in normotensive subjects from a meta-analysis of 23 studies. Am J Cardiol 1991;67:723-727. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hirotsu C, Ohta E, Hirose N, et al. Profile analysis of 24-hours measurements of blood pressure. Biometrics 2003; 59:907-915. Go to original source...
  13. Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. JAMA 1999;282:539-546. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, De Bacquer DA, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2407-2415. Go to original source...
  15. Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijs L, et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality: the Dublin outcome study. Hypertension 2005;46:156-161. Go to original source...
  16. Dolan E, Stanton AV, Thom S, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring predictscardiovascular events in treated hypertensive patients - an Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcomes trial substudy. J Hypertens 2009;27:876-885. Go to original source...
  17. Rodriguez-Roca GC, Alonso-Moreno FJ, Garcia-Jimenez A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the follow-up of hypertension. Blood Press 2006;15:27-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997;278:1065-1072. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Rodriguez-Roca GC, Alonso-Moreno FJ, Garcia-Jimenez A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the follow-up of hypertension. Blood Press 2006;15:27-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Gardner SF, Schneider EF. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in primary care. J Am Board Fam Pract 2001;14:166-171. Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.