Cor Vasa 2011, 53(6-7):333-339 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2011.083

Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Five-year single centre experience

Martin Šimek1,*, Marek Gwozdziewicz1, Pavel Marcián1, Kateřina Langová2, Petr Šantavý1, Andrea Steriovský1, Ivo Fluger1, Vladimír Lonský1
1 Kardiochirurgická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc a Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého
2 Ústav lékařské biofyziky, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, Česká republika

Aim: To determine the outcome of endoscopic vein harvesting for CABG and impact of growing experience with method on its performance.

Methods: From September 2005 to September 2010, endoscopic vein harvesting was carried out in the group of 400 elective patients.
Demographic, perioperative, and outcome data was followed-up prospectively to assess impact of growing experience on the results of the method. Furthermore, univariable analysis focused on impact of wound-healing complication risk factors was added.

Results: Mean age was 68.9 ± 8.5 years, men dominated over women (69 vs. 31%), and mean BMI reached 31.1 ± 4.1. The mean number of 2.1 ± 0.8 venous grafts was harvested in total mean length 34.4 ± 9.6 cm and the mean total vein harvesting time reached 41.8 ± 10.4 min.
In seven cases (1.8%), endoscopic vein harvest needed to be converted. In the postoperative period, the presence of wound haematoma was noted in 33% of harvest, residual leg edema in 12%, 7.8 % of patients complained of mild lower leg pain and 5.3% of saphenous neuropathy. No wound healing disturbances were found, transient lymphatic discharge was recorded in 1.2% of cases. During 3-month follow-up, the incidence of residual edema, pain, and saphenous neuropathy decreased to 5%, 4%, and 3.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis did not reveal any correlation between the presence of wound-healing risk factors and post-harvesting complications. Improvements in performance led to significant increase of graft length/harvesting time ratio and decrease in post-harvesting complications.

Conclusion: Outcome of endoscopic vein harvesting is closely related to the experience with the method; in addition, the pre-operative presence of wound-healing risk factors has no influence on post-harvesting complication rate.

Keywords: Vein harvesting; Endoscopic harvesting; CABG

Published: June 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šimek M, Gwozdziewicz M, Marcián P, Langová K, Šantavý P, Steriovský A, et al.. Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Five-year single centre experience. Cor Vasa. 2011;53(6-7):333-339. doi: 10.33678/cor.2011.083.
Download citation

References

  1. Jordan WD Jr, Voellinger DC, Schroeder PT, McDowell HA. Video-assisted saphenous vein harvest: the evolution of a new technique. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:405-412. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. M inimally invasive conduit harvesting: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:324-333. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Šimek M, Bruk V, Němec P. Endoskopický odběr vena saphena magna pro revaskularizaci myokardu. Pooperační a střednědobé výsledky souboru 100 nemocných. Cor Vasa 2006;48:427-432. Go to original source...
  4. Bridgewater B, Gummert J. Fourth EACTS Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report 2010. United Kingdom: Dendrite Cinical System, 2010:240.
  5. Schade I, Loewe B. Minimally invasive vein harvesting. In: Gulielmos V. Beating heart bypass surgery and minimally invasive conduit harvesting. Darmstadt: Springer, 2004;187-194. Go to original source...
  6. Goldsborough MA, Miller MH, Gibson J, et al. Prevalence of leg w ound complications after coronary artery bypass grafting: determination of risk factors. Am J Crit Care 1999;8:149-153. Go to original source...
  7. Garland R, Frizelle FA, Dobbs BR, et al. A retrospective audit of long-term lower limb complications following leg vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:950-955. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dusterhoft V, Bauer M, Buz S, et al. Wound healing disturbance after vein harvesting for CABG. A randomized trial to compare the minimally invasive direct vision and traditional approach. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:2038-2043. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Čoček D, Pirk J. Méně invazivní odběr žilního št ěpu ke koronárnímu bypassu. Cor Vasa 2000;42:397-400.
  10. Patel AN, Hebeler RF, Hamman BL. Prospective analysis of endoscopic vein harvesting. Am J Surg 2001;182:716-719. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Coppoolse R, Rees W, Krech R, et al. Routine minimal invasive vein harvesting reduces postoperative morbidity in cardiac bypass procedures. Clinical report of 1400 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16(Suppl 2):S61-S66. Go to original source...
  12. Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Al-Ruzzeh S, et al. Are wound healing disturbances and length of hospital stay reduced with minimally invasive vein harvest? A meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;24:1-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Simek M, Nemec P, Gwozdziewicz M, et al. Endoscopic versus minimally invasive vein harvesting - impact on leg-related morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 2008;49:673-678.
  14. Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W, et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trial and controlled trials. Innovations 2005;1:61-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Panesar SS, et al. Does minimally invasive vein harvesting technique affect the quality of the conduit for coronary revascularization? Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:2407-2414. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Griffith GL, Keith BA, Waller FB, et al. Endoscopic and traditional saphenous vein harvest: A histologic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:520-523. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Alrawi SJ, Balaya F, Raju R, et al. A comparative study of endothelial cell injury during open and endoscopic saphenectomy: an electron microscopic evaluation. Heart Surg Forum 2001;4:120-127.
  18. Alrawi SJ, Samee M, R aju R, et al. Intercellular and vascular c ell adhesion molecule levels in endoscopic and open saphenous v ein harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:241-245.
  19. Yun KL, Wu Y, Aharonian V, et al. Randomized trial of endosc opic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month patency rates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:496-503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Davis Z, G arber D, Clark S, et al. Long-term patency of c oronary grafts with endoscopically harvested saphenous veins determined by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:823-828. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ. Influence of endoscopic versus traditional safenectomy on event-free survival: five-year follow-up a prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 2003;6:143-145.
  22. Allen K, Cheng D, Cohn W, et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a concensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery (ISMICS) 2005. Innovations 2005;1:51-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W, et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trial and controlled trials. Innovations 2005;1:61-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Burris, N, Schwartz, K, Brown, et al. Incidence of residual clot strands in saphenous vein grafts after endoscopic harvest. Innovations 2006;1:323-327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Brown EN, Kon ZN, Tran R, et al. Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1259-1265. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Burris N, Schwartz K, Tang CM, et al. Catheter-based infrared light scanner as a tool to assess conduit quality in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:419-427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Rousou LJ, Taylor KB, Lu XG, et al. Saphenous v ein conduits harvested by endoscopic technique exhibit structural and functional damage. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:62-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:235-244. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Alexander JH, Hafley G, Harrington RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005;294:2446-2454. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Aranki SF,Shopnick B. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting. N Engl J Med 2009;361;1907-1910. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Dacey LJ, Braxton JH Jr, Kramer RS, et al. Long-term outcomes of endo - scopic vein harvesting after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2011;123:147-153. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Ouzounian M, Hassan A, Buth K J, et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest techniques on outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:403-408. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Rao C, A ziz O, Deeba S, et al. Is minimally in vasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:809-815. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. García-Altés A, Peiró S. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence of endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting: is it efficient? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011;14. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.02.010. In press. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Schulz SC, Stapleton D, D'Ambra P, et al. Prospective randomized study comparing the Teleflex Medical SaphLITE retractor to the Ethicon Cardiovation Clearglide Endoscopic System. J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;24:1-7. Go to original source...
  36. Calcaterra D, Salerno TA. Venous gas embolization during endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary artery revascularization: a life-threatening event. J Card Surg 2007;22:498-499. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Rojas-Pena A, Koch KL, Heitner HD, et al. Quantification of thermal spread and burst pr essure after endoscopic vessel harvesting: A comparison of 2 commercially available devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.055. In press. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.