Cor Vasa 2009, 51(4):255-259 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2009.064

Implantation of stents into significant carotid artery stenoses using the FilterWire EZTM system

Josef Veselka1,*, Petra Zimolová1, Pavel Stanka1, Lucie Martinkovičová1, Daniela Černá1, Jiří Fiedler1, Petr Hájek1, Martin Malý1, David Zemánek1, Radka Adlová1, David Tesař2, Aleš Tomek3, Martin Šrámek3
1 Kardiologické oddělení, Kardiovaskulární centrum, Fakultní nemocnice v Motole a 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy
2 Klinika zobrazovacích metod
3 Neurologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice v Motole a 2. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha, Česká republika

Objectives: To report on the early outcomes of a prospective single-center registry, which evaluated the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of carotid artery stenting using the FilterWire EZTM Embolic Protection System in high-risk patients.

Methods: Between September 2005 and November 2008, 185 consecutive patients (70±9 years, 34% symptomatic, 87% at high risk) underwent 226 carotid artery stenting procedures with the FilterWire EZTM Embolic Protection System and different carotid stents. This study included both symptomatic (≥50% carotid artery stenosis) as well as asymptomatic (≥70% carotid artery stenosis) patients. The primary endpoint was the rate of 30-day adverse events, defined as neurological death, stroke or postprocedural myocardial infarction.

Results: We implanted 230 stents, carotid artery stenoses before and after direct carotid artery stenting were 82±10% and 10±13%, respectively. The median of fluoroscopic time was 6 min (range 2.5-31.5 min). One patient was referred for surgical endarterectomy. There were two minor strokes, one major stroke and one myocardial infarction within 30 post-procedural days; the primary endpoint occurred in four patients (1.8%). Two patients died from non-neurological causes unrelated to carotid stenting.

Conclusion: Carotid artery stenting with the FilterWire EZTM Embolic Protection System is feasible and safe. Short-term results with respect to neurological events are acceptable.

Keywords: Stent; Stenosis; Carotid artery; Filter

Published: April 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Veselka J, Zimolová P, Stanka P, Martinkovičová L, Černá D, Fiedler J, et al.. Implantation of stents into significant carotid artery stenoses using the FilterWire EZTM system. Cor Vasa. 2009;51(4):255-259. doi: 10.33678/cor.2009.064.
Download citation

References

  1. Al-Mubarak N, Roubin GS, Vitek JJ, New G, Iyer SS. Procedural safety and short-term outcome of ambulatory carotid stenting. Stroke 2001;32:2305-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bates ER, Babb JD, Casey DE, et al. ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:126-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Cremonesi A, Rubino P, Grattoni C, Scheinert D, Castriota F, Biamino G. Multicenter experience with a new "hybrid" carotid stent. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:186-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1572-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Bignamini A, et al. Carotid artery stenting. First consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD joint committee. Stroke 2006;37:2400-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti GM, Wholey MH, Wholey MH. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:177-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Hopkins NL, Myla S, Grube E, et al. Carotid artery revascularization in high surgical risk patients with the NexStent and the FilterWire EX/EZ: 1-year results in the CABERNET Trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008;71:950-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Lanzer P, Weser R, Prettin C. Carotid-artery stenting in a high-risk patient population: single centre, single operator results. Clin Res Cardiol 2006;95:4-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Loftus IM, Thompson MM. The role of carotid stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2007;14:705-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Roubin GS, Iyer S, Halkin A, Vitek JJ, Brennan C. Realizing the potential of carotid artery stenting: proposed paradigms for patient selection and procedural technique. Circulation 2006;113:2021-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Safian RD, Bresnahan JF, Jaff MR, et al. CREATE Pivotal Trial Investigators. Protected carotid stenting in high-risk patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2384-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. SPACE Collaborative Group. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2006;368: 1239-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Veselka J, Černá D, Zimolová P, et al. Thirty-day outcomes of direct carotid stenting with cerebral protection in high-risk patients. Circ J 2007;71: 1468-72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. White CJ, Iyer SS, Hopkins LN, et al. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: The BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006;67:503-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493-501. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, et al. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 1660-71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P. Carotid stenting is a valuable alternative to carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg 2008;49:709-13.
  18. Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leyes D, et al. Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomized, multicenter trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:885-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR, et al. Result of the stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenosis at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomized trial. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:890-902. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1572-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Veselka J. Hledání optimální terapie karotického onemocnění bude zřejmě úkolem i pro další generace lékařů. Cor Vasa 2008;50:320-1. Go to original source...
  22. Verzini F, Cao P, De Rango P, et al. Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:1205-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Balzer JO. How to introduce carotid angioplasty without compromising patient safety. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2008;36:138-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Roffi M, Greutmann M, Schwarz U, et al. Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther 2008;15:103-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.