Cor Vasa 2007, 49(9):293-301 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2007.110

The changing patterns of clinical features and treatment of stable angina in the Czech Republic

Jaromír Hradec1, Martina Sachová2
1 III. interní klinika, Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice a 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy
2 Servier, s. r. o., Praha, Česká republika

Aim:
An Angina Treatment Patterns (ATP) survey was performed in 2001 to obtain information about the status of diagnosis and treatment of patients with stable angina in the Czech Republic. A similar survey, ATP III, was conducted in 2006. The results of both surveys were compared.


Groups of patients:
ATP I enrolled 640 patients while ATP III involved 1,308 outpatients with stable angina.

Results:
The following changes were documented over the past 5 years, from 2001 to 2006:
1. Angina patients were on average 2 years older (69 ± 10 vs. 67 ± 9 years).
2. Mean blood pressure levels have increased (139 ± 15/83 ± 9 vs. 136 ± 15/81 ± 8 mmHg) as has the proportion of hypertensive patients (83 vs. 71%).
3. The number of patients with dyslipidemia has increased (78 vs. 66 %) whereas the mean plasma levels of total and LDL-cholesterol have decreased (5.1 ± 1.3 vs. 5.6 ± 0.9 mmol/L
and 3.1 0.9 vs. 3.4 1.0 mmol/L, respectively).
4. The proportion of patients having a myocardial infarction has increased markedly (49.6 vs. 33.0%) as has that of patients having coronary angiography (55.2 vs. 16.3%).
5. Treatment patterns have changed dramatically. The number of invasively treated patients has more than doubled (56.0 vs. 24.4%), mainly because of the increased use of PCI (39.7 vs. 13.3%).
6. Major changes have occurred in drug therapy. The proportion of patients receiving beta-blockers has increased (79.7 vs. 64.4%) while that of patients treated by nitrates has shrunk (65.9 vs. 82.8%). There has been a significant increase in the use of lipid-lowering agents (82.4 vs. 57.0%), with statins playing a clearly dominant role (90.1 vs. 61.9%) and an evident departure from fibrates (9.2 vs. 32.6%). Other drugs used more frequently include ACE inhibitors (60.7 vs. 54.8%) and, more recently, sartans (19.9 vs. 1.3%). The proportion of patients taking oral anticoagulants has increased (12.5 vs. 4.2%) while that of patients using antiplatelet agents has remained almost unaltered (88.6 vs. 87.0%). The spectrum of agents has changed considerably, with a clear tendency towards the use of higher daily doses.

Conclusion:
The risk profile of angina patients in the Czech Republic has deteriorated significantly over the past 5 years. The number of patients treated invasively has doubled and drug therapy has also improved significantly.

Keywords: Stable angina; Drug therapy; ATP survey; Secondary prevention of CHD

Published: September 1, 2007  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hradec J, Sachová M. The changing patterns of clinical features and treatment of stable angina in the Czech Republic. Cor Vasa. 2007;49(9):293-301. doi: 10.33678/cor.2007.110.
Download citation

References

  1. Eastaugh JL, Calvert MJ, Freemantel N. Highlighting the need for better patient care in stable angina: results of the international Angina Treatment Patterns (ATP) Survey in 7074 patients. Family Practice 2005;22:43-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Hradec J, Chaloupka V, Sachová M. Angina Treatment Patterns Survey. Současný stav diagnostiky a léčby nemocných se stabilní anginou pectoris v České republice. Cor Vasa 2003;45:173-80.
  3. Daly CA, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, et al. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005;26:996-1010. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Daly CA, Clemens F, Lopez Sendon JL, et al. The initial management of stable angina in Europe, from the Euro Heart Survey. A description of pharmacological management and revascularization strategies initiated within the first months of presentation to a cardiologist in the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1011-22. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Widimský P, Želízko M, Janský P, et al. The incidence, treatment strategies and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in the "reperfusion network" of different hospital types in the Czech Republic: Results of the Czech evaluation of acute coronary syndromes in hospitalized patients (CZECH) registry. Int J Cardiol, in press, available online 18. 4. 2007. Go to PubMed...
  6. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. RITA-2 trial participants. Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina. The second Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2). Lancet 1997; 350:461-8.
  8. Parisi AF. Clinical trials of coronary revascularization for chronic stable angina: medical treatment versus coronary revascularization. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15: 275-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Widimský J, Juráň F, Vaněk P, et al. Výrazné zlepšení stavu kardiovaskulární farmakoterapie u nemocných po infarktu myokardu a/nebo revaskularizaci myokardu v roce 1999/2000 v České republice oproti stavu v roce 1995. Cor Vasa 2001;43:34-40.
  10. Widimský J, Vaněk P, Juráň F, Lánská V. Stav kardiovaskulární farmakoterapie u nemocných po infarktu myokardu a/nebo revaskularizaci myokardu v roce 2005 v České republice. Vývoj za 5 a 10 let. Cor Vasa 2006; 48:135-41. Go to original source...
  11. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. for the COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. New Engl J Med 2007;356:1503-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Cífková R, Býma S, Češka R, et al. Prevence kardiovaskulárních onemocnění v dospělém věku. Společné doporučení českých odborných společností. Cor Vasa 2005;47 (Suppl):3-14.
  13. Býma S, Hradec J, Herber O, Karen I. Prevence kardiovaskulárních onemocnění. Doporučený diagnostický a léčebný postup pro všeobecné lékaře 2004. Společnost všeobecného lékařství ČLS JEP, Centrum doporučených postupů pro všeobecné praktické lékaře. SVL 2004:1-9.
  14. Detry JM, Sellier P, Pennaforte S, et al. for the Trimetazidine European Multicenter Study Group. Trimetazidine: a new concept in the treatment of angina. Comparison with propranolol in patients with stable angina. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1994;37:279-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Dalla-Volta S, Maraglino D, Della-Valentina P, et al. Comparison of trimetazidine with nifedipine in effort angina: a double-blind, crossover study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1990;4 (Suppl. 4):853-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Manchanda SC, Krishnaswami S. Combination treatment with trimetazidine and diltiazem in stable angina pectoris. Heart 1997;78:353-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Szwed H, Sadowski Z, Elikowski W, et al. Combination treatment in stable effort angina using trimetazidine and metoprolol: results of a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study (TRIMPOL II). TRIMetazidine in POLand. Eur Heart J 2001;22:2267-74. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Hradec J, Filipová S. TRIKET I a II (TRImetazidin v Kombinaci s Existující Terapií). Výsledky české a slovenské multicentrické studie u 320 nemocných se stabilní námahovou anginou pectoris. Cor Vasa 2001; 43:436-42.




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.