Cor Vasa 2011, 53(10):542-546 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2011.134

Our first experience with aortic valve sparing operations

František Sabol1, Adrian Kolesár1,*, Ján Luczy1, Gabriel Valočík2, Anton Bereš1, Lucia Mistríková1, Martin Beňa1, Martin Ledecký1, Marta Jakubová3, Peter Čandík3, Imrich Sopko3, Povol Török3, Jozefína Cocherová3, Jana Jevčáková1, Ingrid Schusterová1, Matúš Marcin4, Martin Vaľko4
1 Klinika srdcovej chirurgie, Lekárska fakulta UPJŠ a VÚSCH, a.s., Košice, SR
2 Kardiologická klinika, Lekárska fakulta UPJŠ a VÚSCH, a.s., Košice, SR
3 Klinika anastézie a intenzívnej medicíny, Lekárska fakulta UPJŠ a VÚSCH, a.s., Košice, SR
4 Klinika srdcovej chirurgie, Úsek perfuziológie a podporných systémov, LF UPJŠ a VÚSCH, a.s., Košice, SR

Aim: To evaluate short- to mid-term outcomes of aortic valve sparing operations performed at our hospital.

Methods: In the period from January 2008 to August 2010, the total of aortic root reconstructions including aortic valve sparing operations were performed at the Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital UPJŠ, Košice. Only 15 patients were included in the follow-up, one patient died in an early postoperative period and one patient required early reoperation with aortic valve replacement. The average age of the patients was 55 ± 9 years. The average grade of aortic regurgitation before the surgery was 2.44 ± 1.2. Dilatation of aortic root, as a cause of aortic regurgitation, was detected in 12 patients, in two patients acute aortic dissection was the cause, and in three cases there was a simple malcoaptation of the leaflets of aortic valve. In five cases we performed supracoronary graft replacement of ascending aorta, in eight cases graft replacement of ascending aorta combined with reimplantation of aortic valve, in next two remodeling of aortic root and finally the isolated aortic valve repair was performed in two patients. All of the root procedures were combined with the leaflet procedures. The follow-up was completed in 11 patients (73.3%).

Results: The average duration of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) was 159 ± 44 min, the average time of cardioplegic arrest was 126 ± 48 min. One death occurred in a patient with an acute dissection due to multiorgan failure (MOF) caused by malperfusion syndrome. Early reoperation was required in one patient as a result of a repair failure. The average grade of aortic regurgitation was decreased from 2.44 ± 1.2 before the surgery to 0.81 ± 0.56 in postoperative period (p < 0.01). The follow-up lasted 10 (3-28) months. Analysis of all patients who completed the follow-up shows that aortic regurgitation < 2 was verified in nine patients (81.8%), aortic regurgitation = 2 in two patients (18.2%). In the period from August 2010 to January 2011, we performed successful aortic valve sparing operations in additional four patients, however, they have not been included in our study group yet.

Conclusion: According to our results we can conclude that even though the aortic valve sparing operations require greater technical skills they can be performed with an acceptable postoperative morbidity and mortality ratio, and in certain cases they represent interesting alternative to a valve replacement with potential advantages for patients.

Keywords: Aortic root aneurysm; Aortic regurgitation; Aortic valve sparing operations; Leaflet prolapse; Aortic root remodeling; Aortic valve reimplantation

Published: October 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Sabol F, Kolesár A, Luczy J, Valočík G, Bereš A, Mistríková L, et al.. Our first experience with aortic valve sparing operations. Cor Vasa. 2011;53(10):542-546. doi: 10.33678/cor.2011.134.
Download citation

References

  1. Popelová J, Benešová M, Brtko M, et al. Doporučené postupy pro diagnostiku a léčbu chlopenních srdečních vad v dospělosti. Cor Vasa 2007;49:K195-K234.
  2. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28:230-268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:e1-148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Yankah CA, Weng Y, Hetzer R, et al. Aortic root surgery - the biological solution. Berlin: Springer Medizin 2010, 616 p. Go to original source...
  5. Pacini D, Settepani F, De Paulis R, et al. R. Early results of valve-sparing reimplantation procedure using the Valsalva conduit: a multicenter study. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:865-871. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Demers P, Miller DC. Simple modification of "T. David-V" valve-sparing aortic root replacement to create graft pseudosinuses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1479-1481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Aicher D, Langer F, Schäfers HJ, et al. Cusp repair in aortic valve reconstruction: does the technique affect stability? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:1533-1538. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Cohn LM. Cardiac surgery in the adult. III. ed. London: McGraw-Hill Medical, 2007, 1704 s.
  9. Kirklin JW, Barrat-Boyes BG. Cardiac surgery. III. ed. Philadalphia: Churchill Livingstone 2003, 1938 s.
  10. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1152-1158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. David TE, Feindel CM, Maganti M, et al. Aortic valve preservation in patients with aortic root aneurysm: results of the reimplantation technique. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:S732-735; discussion S785-790. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Vojáček J, Harrer J, Dominik J, et al. Options in reconstructive procedures in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Cor Vasa 2010;52:523-530. Go to original source...
  13. Vojáček J, Tuna M, Vaněková S, et al. Aortic valve-aparing surgery-early and mid-term outcomes. Cor Vasa 2009;51:781-788. Go to original source...
  14. El Khoury G, Glineur D, Rubay J, et al. Functional calssification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures. Curr Opin Cardiol 2005;20:115-121. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Lansac E, Di Centa I, Raffoul R, et al. A lesional classification to standardize surgical management of aortic insufficiency towards valve repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008;33:872-878. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D, et al. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:436-438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Aicher D, Langer F, Schäfers HJ, et al. Aortic root remodeling: ten-year experience with 274 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:909-915. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S, et al. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:127-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Nataf P, Lansac E. Dilation of the thoracic aorta: medical and surgical management. Heart 2006;92:1345-1352. Go to original source...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.