Cor Vasa 2019, 61(3):e285-e289 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2019.012

(Tryton - an alternative to established bifurcation techniques?)

Jiří Widimský, David Horák, Vladimír Hraboš, Zdeněk Šembera, Lukáš Jaworski, Jan Horák
Kardiovaskulární centrum, Krajská nemocnice Liberec, Liberec

Bifurcation lesions make up 15-20% of all treated coronary lesions. Despite impressive advances in interventional cardiology, their treatment has been associated with technical challenges and rather poor clinical efficacy. The main recommended strategy in the treatment of these lesions is "provisional stenting", with a double-stent technique to be possibly considered as an alternative. In our registry, we decided to assess the safety, technical and clinical success rates in the treatment of these lesions using the dedicated Tryton Side Branch bifurcation stent. The registry included 201 patients of an unselected population considered for treatment using the Tryton bifurcation stent at the Cardiovascular Center of the Liberec Regional Hospital from June 2012 through April 2016. The success rate of bifurcation lesions treatment with the Tryton stent was 85.07%. The patients were subsequently followed up for six months since the procedure. Three patients experienced a myocardial infarction, with only three patients requiring revascularization, and no need to treat the culprit artery or lesion in a single case. The question of bifurcation lesion treatment remains open; an alternative strategy in these patients seems to be the use of dedicated bifurcation stents. The advantage of the Tryton bifurcation stent is that it protects the side branches, whose treatment may pose a problem with most standard techniques. Judging by our data, the Tryton stent can be employed with advantage especially in bifurcation lesions in large side arteries (≥ 2.5 mm). Overall, data from our registry support the device's very good safety profile and success rate in the treatment of this type of bifurcation lesions using the Tryton stent.

Keywords: Bifurcation lesion, Stent Tryton

Received: March 29, 2019; Accepted: April 1, 2019; Published: June 21, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Widimský J, Horák D, Hraboš V, Šembera Z, Jaworski L, Horák J. (Tryton - an alternative to established bifurcation techniques?). Cor Vasa. 2019;61(3):e285-289. doi: 10.33678/cor.2019.012.
Download citation

References

  1. Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease: what do we know, what should we do? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008;1:218-226. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Brar SS, Gray WA, Dangas G, et al. Bifurcation stenting with drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. EuroIntervention 2009;5:475-484. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Gao XF, Zhang YJ, Tian NL, et al. Stenting strategy for coronary artery bifurcation with drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of nine randomised trials and systematic review. EuroIntervention 2014;10:561-569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Maeng M, Holm NR, Erglis A, et al., Nordic Baltic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Study Group. Long-term results after simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: Nordic Bifurcation Study 5-year follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:30-34. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Song YB, Hahn JY, Song PS, et al. Randomized comparison of conservative versus aggressive strategy for provisional side branch intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the SMART-STRATEGY (Smart Angioplasty Research Team-Optimal Strategy for Side Branch Intervention in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2012;5:1133-1140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al., American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:e44-e122.
  7. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) andthe European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014;35: 2541-2619. Go to original source...
  8. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006;59:183. Go to original source...
  9. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al., Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007;115:2344-2351. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Généreux P, Kumsars I, Lesiak M, et al., A Randomized Trial of a Dedicated Bifurcation Stent Versus Provisional Stenting in the Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:533-543. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Généreux P, Kumsars I, Schneider JE, et al. Dedicated Bifurcation Stent for the Treatment of Bifurcation Lesions Involving Large Side Branches: Outcomes From the Tryton Confirmatory Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:1338-1346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Grundeken MJ, Asgedom S, Damman P, et al. Six-month and one-year clinical outcomes after placement of a dedicated coronary bifurcation stent: a patient-level pooled analysis of eight registry studies. EuroIntervention 2013;9:195-203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.





Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.