Cor Vasa 2018, 60(6):e615-e621 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2018.01.006

The prognostic value of exercise stress echocardiography - Validation of a newly implemented method in our center

Luboš Jukla, Jiří Vondráka, Martin Kubrychta, Martin Pavolkoa,b, Petr Vojtíšeka, Jan Matějkaa, Jan Večeřaa,b,*
a Kardiologické oddělení, Interní klinika, Pardubická krajská nemocnice, Nemocnice Pardubického kraje a.s., Pardubice, Česká republika
b Kardiologické centrum Agel, a.s., Pardubice, Česká republika

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the validity and prognostic value of exercise stress echocardiography, as a newly introduced method at our workplace, over the medium-term time horizon.

Methods and results: Between February 2014 and May 2017, 204 patients (63% males, 60 ± 11 years) underwent exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) due to stable symptoms including chest pain or exertional dyspnea, with a known or suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD). A pre-test probability of IHD was 45 ± 17%. The contrast agent was used in 25 (12%) patients. Positive test: new appearance of wall motion abnormalities in at least two adjacent left ventricular segments. The test complication rate was 0%.
ESE was positive in 13 (6%) patients, 10 of them (77%) had a significant coronary artery stenosis. ESE was non-diagnostic (patients failed to achieve 85% of maximum predicted heart rate) in 27 (13%) patients.
During the follow-up (median 17, IQR 8-29 months) 195 patients (96%) were successfully contacted. 2 (1%) patients died of malignancy, 68 (33%) were referred to coronary angiography, 2 (1%) had unstable angina pectoris (UAP), 2 (1%) had myocardial infarction (MI), 12 (6%) underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or surgical revascularization. Patients with positive test result: n = 13 (6%): 9 (69%) underwent revascularization due to significant coronary artery stenosis, 2 (15%) had MI. Patients with non-diagnostic test n = 27 (14%): 2 (7%) died of malignancy, 1 patient underwent PCI. Patients with negative diagnostic test n = 164 (80%), 2 cases of new-onset angina pectoris within 12 months following the testing (PCI was performed).
The negative predictive value (death, MI, UAP, revascularization) of negative diagnostic test was 98.8%.

Conclusion: Exercise stress echocardiography in hands of an experienced operator is a safe and valuable method. Negative result of a diagnostic exercise stress echocardiography has, based on our experience, an excellent negative predictive value concerning cardiovascular morbidity and mortality within the 17 month-time median.

Keywords: Ischemic heart disease; Stress echocardiography

Received: December 13, 2017; Revised: January 11, 2018; Accepted: January 13, 2018; Published: December 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jukl L, Vondrák J, Kubrycht M, Pavolko M, Vojtíšek P, Matějka J, Večeřa J. The prognostic value of exercise stress echocardiography - Validation of a newly implemented method in our center. Cor Vasa. 2018;60(6):e615-621. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2018.01.006.
Download citation

References

  1. R. Sicari, P. Nihoyannopoulos, A. Evangelista, et al., Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement - executive summary: European Association of Echocardiography (a registrated branch of the ESC), European Heart Journal 30 (2009) 278-289. Go to original source...
  2. G. Montalescot, U. Sechtem, S. Achenbach, et al., 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology, European Heart Journal 34 (2013) 2949-3003. Go to original source...
  3. P. Kolh, S. Windecker, Alfonso et al., 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), European Heart Journal 35 (2014) 2541-2619. Go to original source...
  4. M.J. Wolk, S.R. Bailey, J.U.Doherty et al., ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Journal of Cardiac Failure 20 (2014) 65-90. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. T.S. Genders, E.W. Steyerberg, H. Alkadhi, et al., A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension, European Heart Journal 32 (2011) 1316-1330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. P. Jeetley, L. Burden R. Senior, Stress echocardiography is superior to exercise ECG in the risk stratification of patients presenting with acute chest pain with negative Troponin, European Journal of Echocardiography 7 (2006) 155-164. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. A. Bouzas-Mosquera, J. Peteiro, F. J. Broullón, et al., Incremental value of exercise echocardiography over exercise electrocardiography in a chest pain unit, European Journal of Internal Medicine 26 (2015) 720-725. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. K. Zacharias, A. Ahmed, B.N. Shah, et al., Relative clinical and economic impact of exercise echocardiography vs. exercise electrocardiography, as first line investigation in patients without known coronary artery disease and new stable angina: a randomized prospective study, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 18 (2017) 195-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. P. S. Douglas, U. Hoffmann, M.R. Patel, Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease, New Englang Journal of Medicine 372 (2015) 291-300.
  10. R. M. Califf, P. W. Armstrong, J. R. Carver, et al., 27th Bethesda Conference: matching the intensity of risk factor management with the hazard for coronary disease events. Task Force 5. Stratification of patients into high, medium and low risk subgroups for purposes of risk factor management, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 27 (1996) 1007-1019. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. N. H. Pijls, P. van Schaardenburgh, G. Manoharan, et al., Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 49 (2007) 2105-2111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. W. Wijns, P. Kolh, N. Danchin, et al., Guidelines on myocardial revascularization, European Heart Journal 31 (2010) 2501-2555. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. ISCHEMIA Study. Available via https://ischemiatrial.org. Accessed 12 Nov 2014
  14. L. D. Metz, M. Beattie, R. Hom, et al., The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 49 (2007) 227-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. R. W. Nesto, G. J. Kowalchuk, The ischaemic cascade: temporal sequence of haemodynamic electrocardiographic and symptomatic expressions of ischaemia, American Journal of Cardiology 59 (1987) 23C-30C. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. P. Nihoyannopoulos, J. C. Kaski, T. Crake, et al., Absence of myocardial dysfunction during stress in patients with syndrome X, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 18 (1991) 1463-1470. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. S. S. Abdelmoneim, M. Bernier, C. G. Scott, et al., Safety of contrast agent use during stress echocardiography: a 4-year experience from a single-center cohort study of 26,774 patients, Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Imaging 2 (2009) 1048-1056. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. [EC RP118] European Commission (2000). Referral Guidelines for Imaging. 2000. Available via http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radioprotection/publication/doc/118_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
  19. E. Picano, E. Pasanisi, J. Brown, et al., A gatekeeper for the gatekeeper: inappropriate referrals to stress echocardiography, American Heart Journal 154 (2007) 285-290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. H. Mertes, S. G. Sawada, T. Ryan, et al., Symptoms, adverse effects, and complications associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Experience in 1118 patients, Circulation 88 (1993) 15-19. Go to original source...
  21. E. Picano, Q. Ciampi, R. Citro, et al., Stress echo 2020: The international stress echo study in ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease, Cardiovascular Ultrasound 15 (2017) 3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. E. Picano, F. Lattanzi, A. Orlandini et al., Stress echocardiography and the human factor: the importance of being expert, Journal of the American Collage of Cardiology 17 (1991) 666-669. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.