Cor Vasa 2018, 60(4):e377-e380 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.11.004

Impact of radial and femoral access on radiation dose and fluorography time in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Jakub Rychlíka,*, Ivan Horňáčekb, Miloslav Tejcb, Erik Petrikovitsb, Zdeněk Klimsaa
a Kardiologické oddělení, Nemocnice Jihlava, Jihlava, Česká republika
b Kardiocentrum Vysočina, Jihlava, Česká republika

Background: Current guidelines favor radial over femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes for safety according to the results of recent trials. However, influence of access site on radiation dose and fluorography time is still unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 390 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome in Kardiocentrum Vysočina. We compared the access site with the number of stents implanted, the average fluorography time in minutes, the average radiation dose and mean effective dose that each patient received in Gy/cm2 or mSv respectively.

Results: Use of femoral access resulted in approximately 11% lower radiation dose (p = 0.03). There has been no significant difference between fluorography time and the number of stents implanted in both cohorts.

Conclusion: We found that the radiation dose was lower in femorally accessed group. Although radiation dose is not the main concern in patients with acute coronary syndromes, our results suggest that femoral access can be preferred over radial access in certain situations.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Coronary intervention; Fluorography time; Radiation dose

Received: October 22, 2017; Revised: November 6, 2017; Accepted: November 10, 2017; Published: August 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Rychlík J, Horňáček I, Tejc M, Petrikovits E, Klimsa Z. Impact of radial and femoral access on radiation dose and fluorography time in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cor Vasa. 2018;60(4):e377-380. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.11.004.
Download citation

References

  1. C. Tan, R.A. Schatz, C. Tan, R.A. Schatz, The history of coronary stenting, Interventional Cardiology Clinics 5 (2016) 271-280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. W.J. Cantor, S.R. Mehta, F. Yuan, et al., Radial versus femoral access for elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography and intervention: insights from the RIVAL trial, American Heart Journal 170 (2015) 880-886. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. E. Romagnoli, G. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Sciahbasi, et al., Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 60 (2012) 2481-2489. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. H. Geijer, J. Persliden, Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access, European Radiology 14 (2004) 1674-1680. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. M.M. Rehani, O. Ciraj-Bjelac, E. Vañó, et al., Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department, Annals of the ICRP 40 (2010) 1-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. E. Picano, E. Vano, M.M. Rehani, et al., The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology, European Heart Journal 35 (2014) 665-672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. M. Mercuri, S. Mehta, C. Xie, et al., Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4 (2011) 347-352. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. A. Sciahbasi, E. Frigoli, A. Sarandrea, et al., Radiation exposure and vascular access in acute coronary syndromes, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 69 (2017) 2530-2537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. A. Cwetsch, Comparison of safety of radial and femoral approaches for coronary catheterization in interventional cardiology, Medical Science Monitor 21 (2015) 1464-1468. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. B. Gray, H. Klimis, S. Inam, et al., Radiation exposure during cardiac catheterisation is similar for both femoral and radial approaches, Heart, Lung and Circulation 24 (2015) 264-269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. G. Plourde, S.B. Pancholy, J. Nolan, et al., Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet 386 (2015) 2192-2203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. J.-L. Georges, L. Belle, L. Meunier, et al., Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 110 (2017) 179-187. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. E. Picano, E. Vano, M.M. Rehani, et al., The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology, European Heart Journal 35 (2014) 665-672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. S.V. Musolino, J. DeFranco, R. Schlueck, The ALARA principle in the context of a radiological or nuclear emergency, Health Physics 94 (2008) 109-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.