Cor Vasa 2016, 58(4):e367-e373 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2015.11.007

The changes of secondary prevention practice in Czech post-stroke patients between 2007 and 2012/13

Jiří Vaněka, Otto Mayer jr.a,b,*, Peter Wohlfahrtc,d, Lenka Kielbergerováe,f, Alena Krajčoviechovác, Jan Bruthansc, Renata Cífkovác,d
a II. interní klinika, Lékařská fakulta Plzeň, Univerzita Karlova v Praze a Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň, Plzeň, Česká republika
b Biomedicínské centrum, Lékařská fakulta Plzeň, Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Plzeň, Česká republika
c Centrum kardiovaskulární prevence, 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Thomayerova nemocnice, Praha, Česká republika
d International Clinical Research Centre, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Brno, Česká republika
e Neurochirurgická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň, Plzeň, Česká republika
f Neurologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň, Plzeň, Česká republika

It is evident that post-stroke patients benefit from appropriate secondary prevention; however, in clinical reality these patients are often overlooked in these terms. We aimed to evaluate the changes in adherence to treatment targets (defined by current guidelines) since 2007 in Czech patients after first ischemic stroke.
Two independent descriptive surveys were undertaken in 2007 and 2012/2013. Consecutive patients less than 81 years of age suffering from verified first ischemic stroke were identified and examined at least 6 months afterwards.
The study population included 2 series of 341 and 424 patients, aged 69.0 (±SD 9.1) and 66.8 (±SD 10.4) years, respectively. The initial stroke management improved between 2007 and 2012/13, the proportion of patients initially hospitalized at stroke unit raised significantly from 6.5 to 41.8%, while initial thrombolysis from 2.4 to 22.2%. Prescription rate of statins increased from 52.2 to 62.0%, while of clopidogrel from 0 to 18.4%.
In 2007 survey about 39% of patients were obese, 61% showed inappropriate blood pressure, 68% were hypercholesterolemic and 33% had inappropriate glucose control. Over time, only control hypercholesterolemia significantly improved between 2007 and 2012/13 (proportion of patients with LDL ≥2.5 mmol/L decreased from 67.9 to 58.3%).
In 2007 survey we observed particularly high mortality risk. 5-year all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were 25.8% and 19.9%, respectively.
In conclusion, despite substantial improvement in acute management, clinical practice in secondary prevention in post-stroke patients remains far from being optimal.

Keywords: Adherence; ESH Stroke Survey; EUROASPIRE; Ischemic stroke; Secondary prevention; Treatment target

Received: July 3, 2015; Accepted: November 19, 2015; Published: August 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vaněk J, Mayer O, Wohlfahrt P, Kielbergerová L, Krajčoviechová A, Bruthans J, Cífková R. The changes of secondary prevention practice in Czech post-stroke patients between 2007 and 2012/13. Cor Vasa. 2016;58(4):e367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2015.11.007.
Download citation

References

  1. K. Pyörälä, G. de Backer, I. Graham, et al., Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendation of the Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society and European Society of Hypertension, European Heart Journal 15 (1994) 1300-1331. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. D. Wood, G. De Backer, D. Faergeman, et al., Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on coronary prevention, European Heart Journal 19 (1998) 1434-1503. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. G. De Backer, E. Ambrossioni, K. Borch-Johnsen, et al., European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice, European Heart Journal 24 (2003) 1601-1610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. I. Graham, D. Atar, K. Borch-Johnsen, et al., European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts), European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 14 (2007) E1-E113. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. J. Perk, G. De Backer, H. Gohlke, et al., ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts), European Heart Journal 33 (2012) 1635-1701. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. EUROASPIRE Study Group, EUROASPIRE. A European Society of Cardiology survey of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: principal results, European Heart Journal 18 (1997) 1569-1582. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. EUROASPIRE II Group, Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries. Principal results from EUROASPIRE II, European Heart Journal 22 (2001) 554-572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. K. Kotseva, D. Wood, G. De Backer, et al., EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries, European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation 16 (2009) 121-137. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. O. Mayer Jr., J. Bruthans, K. Timoracka, The changes in cardiovascular prevention practice between 1995 and 2012 in the Czech Republic. A comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, III and IV study, Cor et Vasa 56 (2014) e91-e97. Go to original source...
  10. P.U. Heuschmann, J. Kircher, T. Nowe, et al., Control of main risk factors after ischaemic stroke across Europe: data from the stroke-specific module of the EUROASPIRE III survey, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 10 (2015) 1354-1362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. J. Bruthans, O. Mayer Jr., J. Šimon, et al., The standards of secondary prevention of stroke in Czech patients in the EUROASPIRE III study/stroke specific module, Cor et Vasa 50 (2008) 446-454. Go to original source...
  12. P. Wohlfahrt, A. Krajcoviechova, M. Jozifova, et al., Low blood pressure during the acute period of ischemic stroke is associated with decreased survival, Journal of Hypertension 33 (2015) 339-345. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. World Health Organization, The WHO Steps Manual. The WHO stepwise approach to the stroke surveillance, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006, http://www.who.int/chp/steps/Manual.pdf.
  14. F. Mahoney, D. Barthel, Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index, Maryland Medical Journal 14 (1965) 61-65. Go to original source...
  15. S.U. Lattimore, J. Chalela, L. Davis, et al., Impact of establishing a primary stroke center at a community hospital on the use of thrombolytic therapy: the NINDS Suburban Hospital Stroke Center experience, Stroke 34 (2003) e55-e57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. A.W. Wojner-Alexandrov, A.V. Alexandrov, D. Rodriguez, et al., Houston paramedic and emergency stroke treatment and outcomes study (HoPSTO), Stroke 36 (2005) 512-1518. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. G.L. Birbeck, D.S. Zingmond, X. Cui, B.G. Vickrey, Multispecialty stroke services in California hospitals are associated with reduced mortality, Neurology 66 (2006) 1527-1532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. C.P. Cannon, B.A. Steinberg, S.A. Murphy, et al., Meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcomes trials comparing intensive versus moderate statin therapy, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 48 (2006) 438-445. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. P. Amarenco, J. Bogousslavsky, A. Callahan, et al., Highdose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack, New England Journal of Medicine 355 (2006) 549-559. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. R.J. Adams, G. Albers, M.J. Alberts, et al., Update to the AHA/ASA recommendations for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack, Stroke 39 (2008) 1647-1652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. P. Rashid, J. Leonardi-Bee, P. Bath, Blood pressure reduction and secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular events: a systematic review, Stroke 34 (2003) 2741-2748. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. PROGRESS Collaborative Group, Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood pressure-lowering regimen among 6105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack, Lancet 358 (2001) 1033-1041. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. D.L. Bhatt, K.A. Fox, W. Hacke, et al., Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events, New England Journal of Medicine 354 (2006) 1706-1717. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. H.C. Diener, J. Bogousslavsky, L.M. Brass, et al., Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Lancet 364 (2004) 331-337. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. P. Santalucia, M. Baviera, L. Cortesi, et al., Epidemiologic trends in Hospitalized Ischemic Stroke from 2002 to 2010: results from a Large Italian population-Based Study, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases (2015) [June 4, Epub ahead of print]. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.