Cor Vasa 2014, 56(4):e369-e375 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.05.005

Why some patients with acute coronary syndrome hospitalised in a university tertiary centre do not undergo coronary angiography? Results from the AHEAD ACS registry

Marián Felšöcia,b,*, Mária Holickáa,d, Jiří Pařenicaa,b,d, Jiří Jarkovskýc, Roman Miklíka,b, Kateřina Hořákováa,d, Jindřich Špinara,b,d
a Interní kardiologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Brno, Česká republika
b Mezinárodní centrum klinického výzkumu, Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Brno, Česká republika
c Institut biostatistiky a analýz Lékařské a Přírodovědecké fakulty Masarykovy univerzity, Brno, Česká republika
d Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno, Česká republika

Aim of study: To evaluate in-hospital and long-term mortality of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) not having in-hospital selective coronary angiography (SCA) and to analyze the reasons for conservative approach.
Method and patients: A single-center retrospective study using registry data. Over the period from January 2005 through April 2009, a total of 193 ACS patients did not have in-hospital SCA. Fifty-five (28.5%) patients were considered for SCA as a scheduled procedure and/or a recent angiographic finding was available (Group I), in 138 (71.5%) patients, SCA was not considered at all (Group K). The subgroups were to be compared in terms of in-hospital parameters and long-term mortality.

Results: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was diagnosed in 50 (25.9%) patients. The most frequent reasons for not performing SCA included prognostically serious comorbidities (22%) and pharmacological stabilization in very old individuals with non-STEMI (21%). One in ten (11%) patients died still before SCA, the same proportion of patients refused to have SCA or had a long ischemia time (STEMI subgroup). A temporary contraindication to SCA was found in 8%, a recent SCA finding not allowing revascularization was available in 8%, while a limiting neurological disease was present in 6% of patients. In-hospital mortality was 30.1%, being higher in Group K (34.1% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.049), 6-year mortality was as high as 78.8%, again with higher rates in Group K (86.2% vs. 60.2%; p < 0.001). Patients receiving conservative therapy were older, with a higher proportion of limiting comorbidities that excluded SCA, and a more serious course of hospitalization.

Conclusion: The most common reasons for not performing SCA in ACS include advanced age of patients, serious, often extracardiac comorbidities, and a complicated course of hospitalization, all factors adversely affecting prognosis. The short- and long-term mortality rates in these patients are high.

Keywords: Coronary angiography; Myocardial infarction; Prognosis

Received: April 30, 2014; Accepted: May 28, 2014; Published: August 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Felšöci M, Holická M, Pařenica J, Jarkovský J, Miklík R, Hořáková K, Špinar J. Why some patients with acute coronary syndrome hospitalised in a university tertiary centre do not undergo coronary angiography? Results from the AHEAD ACS registry. Cor Vasa. 2014;56(4):e369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.05.005.
Download citation

References

  1. P. Widimsky, T. Budesinsky, D. Vorac, et al., Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs. immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial - PRAGUE-2, European Heart Journal 24 (2003) 94-104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. A.A. Bavry, D.J. Kumbhani, A.N. Rassi, et al., Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 48 (2006) 1319-1325. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. J. Spinar, J. Parenica, J. Vitovec, et al., Baseline characteristics and hospital mortality in the Acute Heart Failure Database (AHEAD) Main registry, Critical Care 15 (2011) R291. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. P. Widimsky, J. Zvárová, Z. Monhart, P. Jansky, The use of revascularization strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes admitted to hospitals without catheterization facilities: results from the ALERT-CZ registry, Cor et Vasa 55 (2013) e207-e211. Go to original source...
  5. L. Mandelzweig, A. Battler, V. Boyko, et al., The second Euro Heart Survey on acute coronary syndromes: characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with ACS in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin in 2004, European Heart Journal 27 (19) (2006) 2285-2293. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. P. Widimsky, M. Zelizko, P. Jansky, et al., The incidence, treatment strategies and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in the "reperfusion network" of different hospital types in the Czech Republic: results of the Czech evaluation of acute coronary syndromes in hospitalized patients (CZECH) registry, International Journal of Cardiology 119 (2007) 212-219. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. P. Widimsky, P. Kala, R. Rokyta, Summary of the 2012 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevations. Prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology, Cor et Vasa 54 (2012) e273-e289. Go to original source...
  8. The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation, European Heart Journal 32 (2011) 2999-3054.
  9. S.R. Mehta, C.B. Granger, W.E. Boden, et al., Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes, New England Journal of Medicine 360 (2009) 2165-2175. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. K.A. Fox, T.C. Clayton, P. Damman, et al., for the FIR Collaboration, Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of individual patient data, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 55 (2010) 2435-2445. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. E. Puymirat, G. Taldir, N. Aissaoui, et al., Use of invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is a major determinant of improved long-term survival. FAST-MI (French registry of acute coronary syndrome), JACC Cardiovascular Intventions 5 (2012) 893-902. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. C.J. Terkelsen, J.F. Lassen, B.L. Norgaard, et al., Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort, European Heart Journal 26 (2005) 18-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. E.H. Vandecasteele, M. De Buyzere, S. Gevaert, et al., Reperfusion therapy and mortality in octogenarian STEMI patients: results from the Belgian STEMI registry, Clinical Research in Cardiology 102 (2013) 837-845. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.