Cor Vasa 2014, 56(4):e291-e296 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.07.002

ST elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary artery disease: complete or incomplete revascularisation?

Vincenzo Vizzi, Thomas W. Johnson, Julian W. Strange, Andreas Baumbach*
Bristol Heart Institute, Upper Maudlin Street, BS2 8HW Bristol, United Kingdom

The most recent guidelines for the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction strongly support a prompt mechanical reopening of the occluded culprit coronary artery. However, there is a great debate regarding how to treat the bystander non-culprit coronary artery disease. While data from retrospective studies and registries suggest that it should be treated in a second staged procedure, a recent randomised study has suggested a better outcome for patients receiving complete revascularisation during the index primary PCI. In this paper we aim to address this controversial point, analysing the most recent and important scientific publications and trying to give a personal point of view according to the clinical practice in our institution.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Multi-vessel coronary artery disease; Primary percutaneous coronary intervention; ST elevation myocardial infarction

Received: June 7, 2014; Revised: July 10, 2014; Accepted: July 12, 2014; Published: August 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vizzi V, Johnson TW, Strange JW, Baumbach A. ST elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel coronary artery disease: complete or incomplete revascularisation? Cor Vasa. 2014;56(4):e291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.07.002.
Download citation

References

  1. J.A. Goldstein, D. Demetriou, C.L. Grines, et al., Multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction, New England Journal of Medicine 343 (2000) 915-922. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. S.-G. Lee, C.W. Lee, M.-K. Hong, et al., Change of multiple complex coronary plaques in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a study with coronary angiography, American Heart Journal 147 (2004) 281-286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. R.A. Corpus, J.A. House, S.P. Marso, et al., Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarction, American Heart Journal 148 (2004) 493-500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. E.L. Hannan, Z. Samadashvili, G. Walford, et al., Staged versus one-time complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction, Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 6 (2013) 12-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Task Force on the management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), P.G. Steg, S.K. James, et al., ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation, European Heart Journal 33 (2012) 2569-2619.
  6. Writing Committee Members, P.T. O'Gara, F.G. Kushner, et al., 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Circulation 127 (2013) e362-e425. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. M.A. Cavender, S. Milford-Beland, M.T. Roe, et al., Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry), American Journal of Cardiology 104 (2009) 507-513. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. A. Dziewierz, Z. Siudak, T. Rakowski, et al., Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease and noninfarct-related artery revascularization on outcome of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (from the EUROTRANSFER Registry), American Journal of Cardiology 106 (2010) 342-347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. M. Jaguszewski, D. Radovanovic, B.K. Nallamothu, et al., Multivessel versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: is more worse?, EuroIntervention 9 (2013) 909-915. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. E.L. Hannan, Z. Samadashvili, G. Walford, et al., Culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease, JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions 3 (2010) 22-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. L.O. Jensen, P. Thayssen, D.K. Farkas, et al., Culprit only or multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease, EuroIntervention 8 (2012) 456-464. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. R. Kornowski, R. Mehran, G. Dangas, et al., Prognostic impact of staged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58 (2011) 704-711. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. H.-C. Chen, T.-H. Tsai, H.-Y. Fang, et al., Benefit of revascularization in non-infarct-related artery in multivessel disease patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, International Heart Journal 51 (2010) 319-324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. C. Di Mario, S. Mara, A. Flavio, et al., Single vs multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) Study, International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions 6 (2004) 128-133. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. L. Politi, F. Sgura, R. Rossi, et al., A randomised trial of target-vessel versus multi-vessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: major adverse cardiac events during long-term follow-up, Heart 96 (2010) 662-667. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. D.S. Wald, J.K. Morris, N.J. Wald, et al., Randomized trial of preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction, New England Journal of Medicine 369 (2013) 1115-1123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. R. Shah, M.R. Khan, K. Matin, Preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction, New England Journal of Medicine 370 (2014) 281-282. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. J.-G. Dillinger, G. Sideris, P. Henry, Preventive angioplasty in myocardial infarction, New England Journal of Medicine 370 (2014) 280-281. Go to original source...
  19. P.J. Vlaar, K.D. Mahmoud, D.R. Holmes, et al., Culprit vessel only versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pairwise and network meta-analysis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58 (2011) 692-703. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. K.R. Bainey, S.R. Mehta, T. Lai, R.C. Welsh, Complete vs culprit-only revascularization for patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, American Heart Journal 167 (2014) 1-14.e2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. D. Carrick, K.G. Oldroyd, M. McEntegart, et al., A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI), Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63 (2014) 2088-2098. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. P. Erne, A.W. Schoenenberger, D. Burckhardt, et al., Effects of percutaneous coronary interventions in silent ischemia after myocardial infarction: the SWISSI II randomized controlled trial, Journal of the American Medical Association 297 (2007) 1985-1991. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. P.A. Tonino, B. De Bruyne, N.H. Pijls, et al., Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention, New England Journal of Medicine 360 (2009) 213-224. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. A. Ntalianis, J.W. Sels, G. Davidavicius, et al., Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 3 (2010) 1274-1281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.025. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. J.H. Dambrink, J.P. Debrauwere, A.W. van't Hof, et al., Non-culprit lesions detected during primary PCI: treat invasively or follow the guidelines?, EuroIntervention 5 (2010) 968-975. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. G.W. Stone, A. Maehara, A.J. Lansky, et al., A Prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis, New England Journal of Medicine 364 (2011) 226-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1002358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. P.C. Smits, STEMI patients and non-culprit lesions: what to do and when?, EuroIntervention 9 (2013) 895-897. http://dx.doi.org/10.4244/EIJV9I8A150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.