Cor Vasa 2010, 52(9):523-530 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2010.139

Options in reconstructive procedures in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve

Jan Vojáček1,*, Jan Harrer1, Jan Dominik1, Pavel Žáček1, Jiří Manďák1, Martin Tuna1, Miroslav Brtko1, Jaroslav Hlubocký2, Aleš Mokráček3
1 Kardiochirurgická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové a Lékařská fakulta v Hradci Králové Univerzity Karlovy v Praze, Kardiocentrum, Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové
2 II. chirurgická klinika - kardiovaskulární chirurgie, Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice a 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha
3 Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Nemocnice České Budějovice, a. s., Česká republika

The bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital heart disorder potentially resulting, among other things, in the development of aortic valve stenosis or regurgitation. In cardiac surgery, there has been an increasing tendency in the last decade toward aortic valve sparing procedures, even in the presence of the bicuspid aortic valve. The benefits of sparing the native aortic valve include elimination of risks associated with replacing the native valve with a prosthetic one. These are thromboembolic and bleeding complications due to permanent anticoagulation treatment in patients with mechanical valves, the risk of premature degeneration of the biological valve requiring reoperation and the risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis in both types of prosthetic valves.
The authors present a review addressing sparing surgery in the incompetent bicuspid aortic valve. The paper examines the anatomy of the bicuspid aortic valve and indications for surgery, and discusses in detail individual surgical techniques and principles of reconstructive procedures. In the closing section of the paper, the authors provide a clear summary of outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve-sparing procedures including their own experience.

Keywords: Bicuspid aortic valve; Aortic valve-sparing surgery; Aortic regurgitation; Dilatation of the ascending aorta

Published: September 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vojáček J, Harrer J, Dominik J, Žáček P, Manďák J, Tuna M, et al.. Options in reconstructive procedures in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve. Cor Vasa. 2010;52(9):523-530. doi: 10.33678/cor.2010.139.
Download citation

References

  1. Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 2000;83: 81-85. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1152-1158. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Oxenham H, Bloomfield P, Wheatley DJ, et al. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Heart 2003;89:715-721. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Popelová J, Benešová M, Brtko M, et al. Doporučení pro diagnostiku a léčbu chlopenních srdečních vad v dospělosti. Cor Vasa 2007;49:K6-K45.
  5. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007;28: 230-268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:e1-e148. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Roberts WC. The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 1970;26:72-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Basso C, Boschello M, Perrone C, et al. An echocardiographic survey of primary school children for bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:661-663. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Sabet HY, Edwards WD, Tazelaar HD, et al. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1999;74:14-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Pettersson GB, Crucean AC, Savage R, et al. Toward predictable repair of regurgitant aortic valves: a systematic morphology-directed approach to bicommissural repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:40-49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Schaefer BM, Lewin MB, Stout KK, et al. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 2008;94:1634-1638. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Fernandes SM, Sanders SP, Khairy P, et al. Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1648-1651. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Olson LJ, Subramanian R, Edwards WD. Surgical patology of pure aortic insufficiency: a study of 225 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1984;59:835-841. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Della Corte A, Bancone C, Quarto C, et al. Predictors of ascending aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valve: a wide spectrum of disease expression. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:397-404; discussion 404-405. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Borger MA, Preston M, Ivanov J, et al. Should the ascending aorta be replaced more frequently in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:677-683. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Aicher D, Fries R, Rodionycheva S, et al. Aortic valve repair leads to a low incidence of valve-related complications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:127-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Frater R. The prolapsing cusp - experimental and clinical observations. Ann Thorac Surg 1967;3:63-70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Ross DN. Surgical reconstruction of the aortic valve. Lancet 1963;1:571-574. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Al Halees Z, Al Shahid M, Al Sanei A, et al. Up to 16 years follow-up of aortic valve reconstruction with pericardium: a stentless readily available cheap valve? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:200-205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Grinda JM, Latremouille C, Berrebi AJ, et al. Aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty for rheumatic aortic valve disease: midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:438-443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Schäfers HJ, Aicher D, Langer F et al. Preservation of the bicuspid aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:S740-S745. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Schäfers HJ, Bierbach B, Aicher D. A new approach to the assessment of aortic cusp geometry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:436-438. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Pethig K, Milz A, Hagl C, et al. Aortic valve reimplantation in ascending aortic aneurysm: risk factors for early valve failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:29-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Lansac E, Di Centa I, Raoux F, et al. An expansible aortic ring for a physiological approach to conservative aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:718-724. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Lansac E, Di Centa I, Sleilaty G, et al. An aortic ring to standardise aortic valve repair: preliminary results of a prospective multicentric cohort of 144 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:147-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Casselman FP, Gillinov AM, Akhrass R, et al. Intermediate-term durability of bicuspid aortic valve repair for prolapsing leaflet. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:302-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. El Khoury G, Vanoverschelde JL, Glineur D, et al. Repair of bicuspid aortic valves in patients with aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2006;114(1 Suppl):I610-I616. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Mangini A, Lemma M, Contino M, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: differences in the phenotypic continuum affect the repair technique. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:1015-1020. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Ashikhmina E, Sundt TM 3rd, Dearani JA, et al. Repair of the bicuspid aortic valve: a viable alternative to replacement with a bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:1395-1401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Davierwala PM, David TE, Armstrong S, et al. Aortic valve repair versus replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:679-686. Go to PubMed...
  31. Vojáček J, Tuna M, Vaněková S, et al. Záchovné operace aortální chlopně - časné a střednědobé výsledky. Cor Vasa 2009;51:781-788. Go to original source...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.