Cor Vasa 2006, 48(3):85-88 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2006.033
Clinical outcome versus post-mortem finding in cardiac surgery
- 1 Kardiochirurgická klinika Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
- 2 Ústav patologie Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého, Olomouc, Česká republika
Introduction:
The clinical diagnosis of death may be inaccurate after cardiac surgery. Autopsy is an important source of knowledge and an integral part of medical education. The only true results can be obtained by comparing the two procedures.
Methods:
Data of all in-hospital deaths after cardiac surgery, occurring in a single institution between February 2002 and December 2004, were collected prospectively. Clinical diagnoses were compared with the autopsy findings.
Results:
Between February 2002 and December 2004, a total of 2,613 patients were operated on. During this period, 69 deaths occurred. Autopsy was performed in 63 patients (91.3%). The mean age of patients at death was 72.0 ± 8.2 years, 62% were male, 44.9% had diabetes, 63.8% had a history of myocardial infarction. Mean ejection fraction was 38.4 ± 13.9% and mean functional class was 3.3 ± 0.9. The most common procedure was coronary artery bypass grafting alone in 47.8% patients, and together with other procedures in 36.2%. Valve surgery was performed in 5.8% and other procedures in 10.1%. The mean time to death was 12.3 ± 16.5 days (range 0-65 days). The most frequent cause of death was heart failure (in 47.6%). Multiorgan failure was the cause of death in 41.3%. Post-mortem examination revealed another or unsuspected cause of death in 8 patients (12.7%). Three out of 8 patients died due to gastrointestinal disease. Additional findings not revealed during life were disclosed in another 6 patients, in whom the clinical and autopsy causes of death were in agreement.
Conclusions:
Autopsy may identify an undiagnosed cause of death in a considerable proportion of patients following cardiac surgery. Moreover, some additional or overlooked findings may contribute to the final picture of clinical failure.
Post-mortem information remains the gold standard and is a most important tool for improving clinical practice.
Keywords: Cardiac surgery; Autopsy; Cause of death
Published: March 1, 2006 Show citation
References
- Lee PN. Comparison of autopsy, clinical and death certificate diagnosis with particular reference to lung cancer. A revue of the published data. APMIS 1994;45 (Suppl):11-42.
- Lee AHS, Gallagher PJ. Post-mortem examination after cardiac surgery. Histopathology 1998;33:399-405.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Zehr KJ, Liddicoat JR, Salazar JD, et al. The autopsy. Still important in cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:380-3.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Deiwick M, Lohrer A, Hoffmeier A, Baba HA, Bocker W, Sheld HH. Postoperative death should be followed by autopsy - an analysis of the autopsy finding of the years 1990 and 1991 in heart sugery center. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;47:82-7.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Goodwin AT, Goddart M, Taylor GJ, Ritchie AJ. Clinical versus actual outcome in cardiac surgery: a post-mortem study. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2000;17:747-51.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lee AHS, Borek BT, Gallagher PJ, et al. Prospective study of the value of necropsy examination in early death after cardiac surgery. Heart 1997;78:34-8.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Stevanovic G, Tukanovic G, Dotlic R, Kanjuh V. Correlation of clinical diagnoses with autopsy finding: a retrospective study of 2 145 consecutive autopsies. Hum Pathol 1986;17:1225-30.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mort TC, Yeston NS. The relations of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1999;27:299-303.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ooi A, Goodwin AT, Goddard M, Ritchie AJ. Clinical outcome versus post-mortem finding in thoracic surgery: a 10-year experience. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2003; 23:878-82.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Cheng TO. The autopsy: Still important. To the editor. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:597-8.