Cor Vasa 2018, 60(2):e127-e132 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.07.004

The mortality benefit seen with the newer more potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor over clopidogrel is dependent on the underlying risk: A class effect as suggested by a meta-regression analysis

J. Wouter Jukemaa,*, Hannes Alberb,c, Petr Widimskýd
a Department of Cardiology C5-P, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Nizozemsko
b Department for Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Clinic Klagenfurt at Wörthersee, Feschingstrasse 11, 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Rakousko
c Karl Landsteiner Institute for Interdisciplinary Science, Reha Zentrum Münster in Tirol, 6232 Münster, Rakousko
d Kardiocentrum 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Šrobárova 50, 100 34 Praha 10, Česká republika

Background: The two newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor have proven superior to clopidogrel in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The extent to which the reduction in mortality seen with ticagrelor is confined to this particular agent is hard to judge by simply looking at the overall study results as the study populations were composed of different cohorts at substantially different risk of death.

Methods: A meta-regression technique was applied to 12 distinctive patient cohorts, six for each of prasugrel and ticagrelor, to investigate differential effects on mortality of P2Y12 inhibitors.

Results: Data for the analysis cohorts, totalling 37,372 patients, were extracted from publications and cover a widely comparable spectrum of patient types, defined by the type of ACS and treatment strategy. The meta-regression lines for cardiovascular mortality with prasugrel or ticagrelor (each versus clopidogrel), as well as for both agents pooled, indicate a linear relationship with increasing benefit seen with higher underlying risk (p = 0.007, 0.021 and 0.003, and R2 = 0.87, 0.77 and 0.62, respectively).

Conclusions: In the ACS patients studied, we found a mortality benefit with the two newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel, which increases progressively as the underlying risk of death increases. This appears to be a class effect for these two newer agents.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Meta-regression; Mortality; Prasugrel; P2Y12 inhibitor; Ticagrelor

Received: June 8, 2017; Accepted: July 18, 2017; Published: April 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wouter Jukema J, Alber H, Widimský P. The mortality benefit seen with the newer more potent oral P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel and ticagrelor over clopidogrel is dependent on the underlying risk: A class effect as suggested by a meta-regression analysis. Cor Vasa. 2018;60(2):e127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.07.004.
Download citation

References

  1. J.T. Brandt, S.L. Close, S.J. Iturria, et al., Common polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel but not Tic, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 5 (2007) 2429-2436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. S. Husted, H. Emanuelsson, S. Heptinstall, et al., Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin, European Heart Journal 27 (2006) 1038-1047. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. S.D. Wiviott, E. Braunwald, C.H. McCabe, et al., Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, New England Journal of Medicine 357 (2007) 2001-2015. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. L. Wallentin, R.C. Becker, A. Budaj, et al., Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes, New England Journal of Medicine 361 (2009) 1045-1057. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. S. De Servi, S. Savonitto, How to explain the reduced cardiovascular mortality in the ticagrelor arm of the PLATO trial?, International Journal of Cardiology 149 (2011) 265-267. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. S. Singh, M. Singh, N. Grewal, et al., Comparative efficacy and safety of prasugrel, ticagrelor, and standard-dose and high-dose clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis, American Journal of Therapeutics 23 (2016) e52-e62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. C. Bavishi, S. Panwar, F.H. Messerli, et al., Meta-analysis of comparison of the newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) to clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome, American Journal of Cardiology 116 (2015) 809-817. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. S. Chatterjee, A. Ghose, A. Sharma, et al., Comparing newer oral anti-platelets prasugrel and ticagrelor in reduction of ischemic events-evidence from a network meta-analysis, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 36 (2013) 223-232. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. S. Steiner, D. Moertl, L. Chen, et al., Network meta-analysis of prasugrel, ticagrelor, high- and standard-dose clopidogrel in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary interventions, Thrombosis and Haemostasis 108 (2012) 318-327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. D. Passaro, V. Fadda, D. Maratea, et al., Anti-platelet treatments in acute coronary syndrome: simplified network meta-analysis, International Journal of Cardiology 150 (2011) 364-367, Erratum in: International Journal of Cardiology 176 (2014) 304. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. E.P. Navarese, M. Verdoia, A. Schaffer, et al., Ischaemic and bleeding complications with new, compared to standard, ADP-antagonist regimens in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials, QJM 104 (2011) 561-569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. G. Biondi-Zoccai, M. Lotrionte, P. Agostoni, et al., Adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis of prasugrel versus ticagrelor for patients with acute coronary syndromes, International Journal of Cardiology 150 (2011) 325-331. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. J.A. Udell, E. Braunwald, E.M. Antman, et al., Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 subgroup analysis (Trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38), JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 7 (2014) 604-612, Erratum in: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 7 (2014) 946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. S. De Servi, J. Goedicke, A. Schirmer, et al., Clinical outcomes for prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial, European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care 3 (2014) 363-372. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. P.K. Smith, L.T. Goodnough, J.H. Levy, et al., Mortality benefit with prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 coronary artery bypass grafting cohort: risk-adjusted retrospective data analysis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 60 (2012) 388-396. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. S.D. Wiviott, H.D. White, E.M. Ohman, et al., Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with or without angiography: a secondary, prespecified analysis of the TRILOGY ACS trial, Lancet 382 (2013) 605-613, Erratum in: Lancet 382 (2013) 768. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. S. Saito, T. Isshiki, T. Kimura, et al., Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome: the PRASFIT-ACS study, Circulation Journal 78 (2014) 1684-1692. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. M.A. Velders, J. Abtan, D.J. Angiolillo, et al., Safety and efficacy of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in primary percutaneous coronary intervention, Heart 102 (2016) 617-625. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. P.G. Steg, S. James, R.A. Harrington, et al., Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes intended for reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial subgroup analysis, Circulation 122 (2010) 2131-2141. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. D. Lindholm, C. Varenhorst, C.P. Cannon, et al., Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome with or without revascularization: results from the PLATO trial, European Heart Journal 35 (2014) 2083-2093. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. C. Held, N. Asenblad, J.P. Bassand, et al., Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: results from the PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) trial, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 57 (2011) 672-684. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. S. Goto, C.H. Huang, S.J. Park, et al., Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in Japanese, Korean and Taiwanese patients with acute coronary syndrome - randomized, double-blind, phase III PHILO study, Circulation Journal 79 (2015) 2452-2460. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. J.C. Fournier, R.J. DeRubeis, S.D. Hollon, et al., Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis, JAMA 303 (2010) 47-53. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. R. Mehran, S. Pocock, E. Nikolsky, et al., Impact of bleeding on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention results from a patient-level pooled analysis of the REPLACE-2 (randomized evaluation of PCI linking angiomax to reduced clinical events), ACUITY (acute catheterization and urgent intervention triage strategy), and HORIZONS-AMI (harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction) trials, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 4 (2011) 654-664. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, G.W. Stone, et al., Relationship between patient's risk profile and benefits in mortality from adjunctive abciximab to mechanical revascularization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta- regression analysis of randomized trials, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 47 (2006) 685-686. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. M. Cattaneo, R. Schulz, S. Nylander, Adenosine-mediated effects of ticagrelor: evidence and potential clinical relevance, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63 (2014) 2503-2509. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. L. Bonello, M. Laine, N. Kipson, et al., Ticagrelor increases adenosine plasma concentration in patients with an acute coronary syndrome, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63 (2014) 872-877. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. T.N. van den Berg, S. El Messaoudi, G.A. Rongen, et al., Ticagrelor does not inhibit adenosine transport at relevant concentrations: a randomized cross-over study in healthy subjects in vivo, PLOS ONE 10 (2015) e0137560. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. V.L. Serebruany, V. Cherepanov, A. Tomek, et al., Among antithrombotic agents, prasugrel, but not ticagrelor, is associated with reduced 30 day mortality in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction, International Journal of Cardiology 195 (2015) 104-110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. A. Migliorini, R. Valenti, G. Parodi, et al., Comparison of the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition with prasugrel versus clopidogrel and clinical outcomes in patients with unprotected left main disease treated with everolimus-eluting stents, American Journal of Cardiology 112 (2013) 1843-1848. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. S. Schulz, D.J. Angiolillo, D. Antoniucci, et al., Randomized comparison of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome and planned invasive strategy - design and rationale of the iNtracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 trial, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research 7 (2014) 91-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Z. Motovska, O. Hlinomaz, R. Miklik, et al., Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter randomized PRAGUE-18 study, Circulation 134 (2016) 1603-1612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.