Cor Vasa 2014, 56(4):e342-e347 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.06.005

Particularities in coronary revascularization in elderly patients presenting with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Maria Dorobanţu, Lucian Câlmâc*, Andrada Bogdan, Vlad Bătăilă, Bogdan Drăgoescu, Andrei Radu, Mugur Marinescu, Şerban Arvanitopol, Gabriel Tatu-Chiţoiu, Rodica Niculescu
Clinical Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Rumania

Nowadays, ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) is seen with greater incidence in older patients. Current guidelines recommend an immediate invasive evaluation and eventually primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in all STEMI patients regardless of age. Nevertheless, data in literature show a significant underuse of interventional treatment in older patients with STEMI.
Our objective is to assess the in-hospital outcome of the elderly STEMI patients compared to the younger ones in the setting of systematic interventional management. We also discussed some particular aspects which we considered as significant concerning the management of elderly patients with STEMI.
We evaluated 975 consecutive STEMI patients admitted to a single centre between January 2012 and July 2013. There were 203 (20.8 %) patients ≥ 75 years old.
Compared to the younger group, in the older group there were more women (47.2% vs 22.7%; p < 0.001), an increased prevalence of hypertension (78.8% vs 65.0%; p < 0.001) but a decreased prevalence of smoking (13.7% vs 48.8%; p < 0.001) and dyslipidemia (54.7% vs 41.3%; p = 0.03). The ≥ 75 years group had more cardiovascular comorbidities: stroke (11.8% vs 4.1%; p < 0.001), atrial fibrillation (23.6% vs 53.9%; p < 0.001) and severe valvulopathies (6.8% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001). Elderly patients presented more frequently with signs of heart failure (Killip class > I: 21.1% vs 7.2%; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar ischemia time with 54.1% vs 55.1% presenting within 6 hours.
There were fewer PCIs performed in the elderly group (74.3% vs 85.7%; p = 0.02). The extension of coronary lesions was not significantly different between the two groups, except for left main disease in favour of the elderly (12.2 % vs 5.1 %; p < 0.001).
There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the in-hospital treatment (dual antiplatelet, anticoagulation, beta-blockers, ACEI/ARB and statin).The in-hospital mortality for our entire study group was 4.41%, with a rate of 11.3% in the older group and 2.59 % in the < 75 years group (p < 0.001).
In-hospital outcome in older patients with STEMI is worse, with an increased mortality rate, especially when associated with heart failure on admission. Fewer PCI were performed in the older patients, although there was no difference in the pharmacological treatment. A strategy based on urgent coronary angiography and, if necessary, primary PCI, should be applied in all eligible patients irrespective of age.

Keywords: ACS; Elderly; Guideline; Interventional; Primary PCI; Reperfusion; Revascularization; STEMI

Received: February 6, 2014; Revised: June 16, 2014; Accepted: June 16, 2014; Published: August 1, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dorobanţu M, Câlmâc L, Bogdan A, Bătăilă V, Drăgoescu B, Radu A, et al.. Particularities in coronary revascularization in elderly patients presenting with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Cor Vasa. 2014;56(4):e342-347. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2014.06.005.
Download citation

References

  1. Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011.
  2. T.J. Arciero, S.J. Jacobsen, G.S. Reeder, et al., Temporal trends in the incidence of coronary disease, American Journal of Medicine 117 (2004) 228-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. E.S. Ford, U.A. Ajani, J.B. Croft, et al., Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000, New England Journal of Medicine 356 (2007) 2388-2398. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. D. Lyoyd-Jones, R.J. Adams, T.M. Brown, et al., Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics - 2010 update: a report from American Heart Association, Circulation 121 (2010) 948-954. Go to original source...
  5. W. Rosamond, K. Flegal, K. Furie, et al., Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2008 update: a report from American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, Circulation 117 (2008) e25-e146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. K.P. Alexander, L.K. Newby, C.P. Cannon, et al., Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology, Circulation 115 (2007) 2549-2569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. C.B. Granger, R.J. Goldberg, O. Dabbous, et al., Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events, Archives of Internal Medicine 163 (2003) 2345-2353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. D. Khera, D. Kolte, C. Palaniswamy, et al., ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly - temporal trends in incidence, utilization of percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in the United States, International Journal of Cardiology 168 (4) (2013) 3683-3690. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. O. Manfrini, M. Dorobantu, Z. Vasiljevic, et al., Acute coronary syndrome in octogenarian patients: results from the international registry of acute coronary syndromes in transitional countries (ISACS-TC) registry, European Heart Journal Supplements 16 (Suppl. A) (2014) A87-A94. Go to original source...
  10. P.G. Steg, S.K. James, D. Atar, et al., ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), European Heart Journal 33 (2012) 2569-2619.
  11. K.P. Alexander, L.K. Newby, P.W. Armstrong, et al., Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology, Circulation 115 (2007) 2570-2589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. P. Grosmaitre, O. Le Vavasseur, E. Yachouh, et al., Significance of atypical symptoms for the diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction in elderly patients admitted to emergency departments, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 106 (11) (2013) 586-592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. P.T. O'Gara, F.G. Kushner, D.D. Ascheim, et al., 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Circulation 127 (2013) e362-e425. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. K.A. Eagle, S.G. Goodman, A. Avezum, et al., Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), Lancet 359 (2002) 373-377. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. E.H. Vandecasteele, M. De Buyzere, S. Gevaert, et al., Reperfusion therapy and mortality in octogenarian STEMI patients: results from the Belgian STEMI registry, Clinical Research in Cardiology 102 (2013) 837-845. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. J.S. Hochman, C.E. Buller, L.A. Sleeper, et al., Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction - etiologies, management and outcome: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry: SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 36 (Suppl. A) (2000) 1063-1070. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. J.S. Hochman, L.A. Sleeper, J.G. Webb, et al., Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, New England Journal of Medicine 341 (1999) 625-634. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Y.P. Yoo, K.-W. Kang, H.S. Yoon, et al., One-year clinical outcomes in invasive treatment strategies for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock in elderly patients, Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 10 (3) (2013) 235-241. Go to PubMed...
  19. F. Kiemeneij, G.J. Laarman, Percutaneous transradial artery approach for coronary Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation, American Heart Journal 128 (1994) 167-174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. S.S. Jolly, S. Yusuf, J. Cairns, et al., Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial, Lancet 377 (2011) 1409-1420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. E. Romagnoli, G. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Sciahbasi, et al., Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 60 (2012) 2481-2489. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. I. Bernat, D. Horak, J. Stasek, et al., ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated by radial or femoral approach in a multicenter randomized clinical trial: the STEMI-RADIAL trial, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63 (2014) 964-972. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. G.G. Secco, L. Marinucci, L. Uguccioni, et al., Transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary interventions in elderly patients, Journal of Invasive Cardiology 25 (5) (2013) 254-256. Go to PubMed...
  24. X. Freixa, M. Trilla, M. Feldman, et al., Right versus left transradial approach for coronary catheterization in octagenarian patients, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 80 (2) (2012) 267-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. H. Khachab, Y. Rahal, L. Boulain, et al., Le syndrome coronarien aigu chez le sujet âgé: expérience du centre hospitalier d'Aix-en-Provence, Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie 62 (2013) 308-315. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. L.P. Fried, L. Ferrucci, J. Darer, et al., Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care, Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59 (2004) 255-263. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. G. Abellan van Kan, Y. Rolland, M. Houles, et al., The assessment of frailty in older adults, Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 26 (2010) 275-286. Go to PubMed...
  28. L.P. Fried, C.M. Tangen, J. Walston, et al., Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype, Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56 (2001) M146-M156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. J.L. Purser, M.N. Kuchibhatla, G.G. Fillenbaum, et al., Identifying frailty in hospitalized older adults with significant coronary artery disease, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 54 (2006) 1674-1681. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. M. Singh, C.S. Rihal, R.J. Lennon, et al., Influence of frailty and health status on outcomes in patients with coronary disease undergoing percutaneous revascularization, Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes 4 (2011) 496-502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.