Cor Vasa 2026, 68(2):179-187 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2025.127

Techniques for dose reduction in pediatric cardiac CT

Marek Kardoš
Department of Functional Diagnostics, Children's Cardiac Center, Bratislava, Slovakia

The increased use of CT scans in children over the past decades has raised concerns about the long-term risks of radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging. Children are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of radiation because they have a longer lifespan, allowing more time for radiation-related effects to accumulate. Technological innovations in computed tomography have facilitated significant reductions in radiation exposure for both adult and pediatric patients while preserving diagnostic imaging quality.

Keywords: Cardiac, CT, Dose reduction, Children,

Received: September 10, 2025; Revised: October 29, 2025; Accepted: November 26, 2025; Prepublished online: June 2, 2012; Published: May 20, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kardoš M. Techniques for dose reduction in pediatric cardiac CT. Cor Vasa. 2026;68(2):179-187. doi: 10.33678/cor.2025.127.
Download citation

References

  1. Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM. Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000-2006. Emerg Radiol 2007;14:227-232. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, et al. National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology 2011;258:164-173. Go to original source...
  3. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:289-296. Go to original source...
  4. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, et al. The 'Image Gently' campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:265-269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Slovis TL. Where we were, what has changed, what needs doing: a decade of progress. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41(suppl 2):456-460. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:499-505. Go to original source...
  7. Raimondi F, Warin-Fresse K. Computed tomography imaging in children with congenital heart disease: Indications and radiation dose optimization. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2016;109:150-157. Go to original source...
  8. Warin Fresse K, Isorni MA, Dacher JN, et al. Cardiac computed tomography angiography in the paediatric population: Expert consensus from the Filiale de cardiologie pédiatrique et congénitale (FCPC) and the Société française d'imagerie cardiaque et vasculaire diagnostique et interventionnelle (SFICV). Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2020;113:579-586. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Attili A, Hensley AK, Jones FD, et al. Echocardiography and coronary CT angiography imaging of variations in coronary anatomy and coronary abnormalities in athletic children: detection of coronary abnormalities that create a risk for sudden death. Echocardiography 2013;30:225-233. Go to original source...
  10. Kaushal S, Backer CL, Popescu AR, et al. Intramural coronary length correlates with symptoms in patients with anomalous aortic origin of the coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:986-991; discussion 991-982. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Jia Q, Zhuang J, Jiang J, et al. Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction. Eur J Radiol 2017;86:190-197. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: Executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease). Circulation 2008;118:2395-2451. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Jadhav SP, Golriz F, Atweh LA, et al. CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:184-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Friedman BA, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika GA, et al. Computed tomographic angiography of infants with congenital heart disease receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatr Cardiol 2009;30:1154-1156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Rigsby CK, McKenney SE, Hill KD, et al. Radiation dose management for pediatric cardiac computed tomography: a report from the Image Gently 'Have-A-Heart' campaign. Pediatr Radiol 2018;48:5-20. Go to original source...
  16. Yang JC, Lin MT, Jaw FS, et al. Trends in the utilization of computed tomography and cardiac catheterization among children with congenital heart disease. J Formos Med Assoc 2014;114:1061-1068. Go to original source...
  17. Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, et al. A comparison ofradiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart 2010;96:92-96. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Huang B, Law MW, Mak HK, et al. Pediatric 64-MDCT coronary angiography with ECG-modulated tube current: radiation dose and cancer risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:539-544. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Ghoshhajra BB, Lee AM, Engel LC, et al. Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cardiac computed tomography: experience from a tertiary medical center. Pediatr Cardiol 2014;35:171-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006;113:1305-1310. Go to original source...
  21. Andreassi MG, Picano E. Reduction of radiation to children: our responsibility to change. Circulation 2014;130:135-137. Go to original source...
  22. Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS, et al. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 2014;130:161-167. Go to original source...
  23. Kalender WA. Dose in x-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2014;59:R129-R150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Yang M, Mo XM, Jin JY, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure in pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography from different injection sites. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:117-122. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Young C, Taylor AM, Owens CM. Paediatric cardiac computed tomography: a review of imaging techniques and radiation dose consideration. Eur Radiol 2011;21:518-529. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Bodelle B, Beeres M, Scheithauer S, et al. Automated tube potential selection as a method of dose reduction for CT of the neck: first clinical results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204:1049-1054. Go to original source...
  27. Gottumukkala RV, Kalra MK, Tabari A, et al. Advanced CT Techniques for Decreasing Radiation Dose, Reducing Sedation Requirements, and Optimizing Image Quality in Children. Radiographics 2019;39:709-726. Go to original source...
  28. Siegel MJ, Hildebolt C, Bradley D. Effects of automated kilovoltage selection technology on contrast-enhanced pediatric CT and CT angiography. Radiology 2013;268:538-547. Go to original source...
  29. Goo HW, Suh DS. Tube current reduction in pediatric non-ECG-gated heart CT by combined tube current modulation. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:344-351. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Han BK, Rigsby CK, Leipsic J, et al. Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease, Part 2: Technical Recommendations. An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT): Endorsed by the Society of Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging (NASCI). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015;9:493-513. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Shuman WP, Leipsic JA, Busey JM, et al. Prospectively ECG Gated CT pulmonary angiography versus helical ungated CT pulmonary angiography: Impact on cardiac related motion artifacts and patient radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2444-2449. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Karlo C, Leschka S, Goetti RP, et al. High-pitch dual-source CT angiography of the aortic valve-aortic root complex without ECG-synchronization. Eur Radiol 2011;21:205-212. Go to original source...
  33. Lell MM, May M, Deak P, et al. High-pitch spiral computed tomography: effect on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric chest computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2011;46:116-123. Go to original source...
  34. Schernthaner RE, Stadler A, Beitzke D, et al. Dose modulated retrospective ECG-gated versus non-gated 64-row CT angiography of the aorta at the same radiation dose: comparison of motion artifacts, diagnostic confidence and signal-to-noise-ratios. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:585-590. Go to original source...
  35. Sun Z, Ng KH. Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated multislice CT coronary angiography: a systematic review of radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:94-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Qin J, Liu LY, Fang Y, et al. 320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Br J Radiol 2012;85:945-951. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Feng Q, Yin Y, Hua X, et al. Prospective ECG triggering versus low-dose retrospective ECG-gated 128-channel CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Clin Radiol 2010;65:809-814. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Hausleiter J, Meyer TS, Martuscelli E, et al. Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: the multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:484-493. Go to original source...
  39. Sorantin E, Riccabona M, Stücklschweiger G, et al. Experience with volumetric (320 rows) pediatric CT. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1091-1097. Go to original source...
  40. Ryu YJ, Kim WS, Choi YH, et al. Pediatric chest CT: wide-volume and helical scan modes in 320-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:1315-1321. Go to original source...
  41. van der Molen AJ, Geleijns J. Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose - comparison of four 16-section CT scanners. Radiology 2007;242:208-216. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Ghadimi Mahani M, Agarwal PP, Rigsby CK, et al. CT for Assessment of Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Multiple Stages of Single-Ventricle Palliation: Challenges and Suggested Protocols. Radiographics 2016;36:1273-1284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  43. Prabhu SP, Mahmood S, Sena L, et al. MDCT evaluation of pulmonary embolism in children and young adults following a lateral tunnel Fontan procedure: optimizing contrast-enhancement techniques. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:938-944. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010;256:32-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Greenberg SB, Bhutta ST. A dual contrast injection technique for multidetector computed tomography angiography of Fontan procedures. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;24:345-348. Go to original source...
  46. Stiller W. Basics of iterative reconstruction methods in computed tomography: A vendor-independent overview. Eur J Radiol 2018;109:147-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Nelson TR. Practical strategies to reduce pediatric CT radiation dose. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:292-299. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Stein T, Rau A, Russe MF, et al. Photon-counting computed tomography-basic principles, potential benefits, and initial clinical experience. Rofo 2023;195:691-698. Go to original source...
  49. Esquivel A, Ferrero A, Mileto A, et al. Photon-counting detector CT: key points radiologists should know. Korean J Radiol 2022;23:854-865. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Willemink MJ, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, et al. Photon-counting CT: technical principles and clinical prospects. Radiology 2018;289:293-312. Go to original source...
  51. Van Ballaer V, Dubbeldam A, Muscogiuri E, et al. Impact of ultrahigh-resolution imaging of the lungs on perceived diagnostic image quality using photon-counting CT. Eur Radiol 2024;34:1895-1904. Go to original source...
  52. Schreck J, Laukamp KR, Niehoff JH, et al. Metal artifact reduction in patients with total hip replacements: evaluation of clinical photon counting CT using virtual monoenergetic images. Eur Radiol 2023;33:9286-9295. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  53. Hellms S, Werncke T, Böttcher J, et al. Reduction of radiation exposure and preserved image quality using photon-counting detector cardiac computed tomography without electrocardiographic gating in children with congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol 2026;36:324-333. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  54. Bani-Ahmad M, England A, McLaughlin L, et al. Potential of artificial intelligence for radiation dose reduction in computed tomography - A scoping review, Radiography (Lond) 2025;31:102968. Go to original source...
  55. Tatsugami F, Nakaura T, Yanagawa M, et al. Recent advances in artificial intelligence for cardiac CT: Enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Diagn Interv Imaging 2023;104:521-528. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.