Cor Vasa 2018, 60(6):e563-e568 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2018.06.007

Analysis of elective coronary angiography findings in patients with suspected angina pectoris in the cardiocenter Hradec Králové - Real-life clinical practice in light of the guidelines

Radek Váleka, Karel Mědílekb,*, Josef Bisb, Jiří Novýa, Jiří Cyranya, Josef Šťásekb
a Interní oddělení, Oblastní nemocnice Jičín a.s., Jičín, Česká republika
b I. interní kardioangiologická klinika, Lékařská fakulta Hradec Králové, Univerzita Karlova a Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Česká republika

Introduction: Coronary angiography (CA) is a gold standard for diagnosis of occlusive coronary atherosclerosis in patients with high pre-test probability of ischemic heart disease (IHD PTP) and in patients with medium pre-test probability, in whom a prognostically significant ischemia is detected during a stress test. The imaging stress tests are preferred to the exercise electrocardiogram due to higher sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this work was to analyze the profile of patients undergoing the elective CA due to suspected IHD.
Study population and methods: Population of 184 patients who underwent elective CA due to suspected IHD between April and August 2016 was retrospectively analyzed in the cardiocenter of University Hospital Hradec Králové. The patient risk profile and use of cardiac stress tests and relation of their results to the CA findings were evaluated. The CA result was considered as positive if ≥50% stenosis of coronary artery in at least one of the coronary territory was found.

Results: Patients with medium PTP prevailed in our study population - 154 (84%), there were 6 (3%) patients with low and 24 (13%) with high PTP. 112 (61%) patients had negative and 72 (39%) positive CA finding. Stress test was performed in 43 cases (23%), exercise electrocardiograms prevailed significantly over the imaging stress tests: 37 (86%) versus 6 (14%). In the medium-risk group, a stress test was performed in 36 (23%) patients, in 92% it consisted of exercise electrocardiogram. None of the patients with low PTP had positive CA, in the medium-risk group the CA was positive in 38% and in the high-risk group in 54%. In the patients with positive exercise electrocardiogram, the CA was positive only in 10 % of cases. 44% of patients with positive and 39% of patients with negative CA had typical angina pectoris.

Conclusion: Most of the patients referred for elective CA have medium risk of IHD. The patient history alone is a weak predictor of IHD. The stress tests for detection of ischemia are performed scarcely with the dominance of exercise electrocardiogram, which is not reliable enough for ischemia detection in the clinical practice. The imaging stress tests are not used to a sufficient extent and the rate of negative elective CAs is high in the analyzed study population.

Keywords: Negative coronary angiography; Stable angina pectoris; Stress test

Received: February 9, 2018; Revised: June 27, 2018; Accepted: June 28, 2018; Published: December 1, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Válek R, Mědílek K, Bis J, Nový J, Cyrany J, Šťásek J. Analysis of elective coronary angiography findings in patients with suspected angina pectoris in the cardiocenter Hradec Králové - Real-life clinical practice in light of the guidelines. Cor Vasa. 2018;60(6):e563-568. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2018.06.007.
Download citation

References

  1. M. Želízko, F. Toušek, H. Skalická, et al., Summary of the 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. Prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology, Cor et Vasa 56 (2014) e259-e273. Go to original source...
  2. S.B. Shurin. Morbidity & Mortality. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 2012 Chart Book.
  3. H. Hemingway, A. McCallum, M. Shipley, et al., Incidence and prognostic implications of stable angina pectoris among women and men, JAMA 295 (2006) 1404-1411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. G. Montalescot, U. Sechtem, Editorial. New ESC guidelines published on stable coronary artery disease, European Heart Journal 34 (2013) 2927-2930. Go to original source...
  5. A. Cubukcu, I. Murray, S. Anderson, et al., What's the risk? Assessment of patients with stable chest pain, Echo Research and Practice 2 (2015) 41-48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. S. Graf, A. Khorsand, M. Gwechenberger, et al., Typical chest pain and normal coronary angiogram: cardiac risk factor analysis versus pet for detection of microvascular disease, Journal of Nuclear Medicine 46 (2007) 175-181.
  7. J.M. Khan, R. Harrison, C. Schnaar, et al., Do NICE tables overestimate the prevalence of significant CAD?, British Journal of Cardiology 21 (2014) 75.
  8. N. Sekhri, G.S. Feder, C. Junghans, et al., How effective are rapid access chest pain clinics? Prognosis of incident angina and non-cardiac chest pain in 8762 consecutive patients, Heart 4 (2007) 458-463. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. K. Mědílek, V. Engelmann, J. Nový, et al., Characteristics and mSPECT results of patients investigated for hest pain according to ESC/ČKS guidelines in Distric Hospital Jičín, Nukleární medicína 4 (2015) 18 (S1).
  10. J.S. Skinner, L. Smeeth, J.M. Kendall, et al., NICE guidance. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin, Heart 96 (2010) 974-978. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. C.J.M. Vrints, R. Senior, F. Crea, et al., Assessing suspected angina: requiem for coronary computed tomography angiography or exercise electrocardiogram?, European Heart Journal 38 (2017) 1792-1800. Go to original source...
  12. R.M. Patel, E.D. Peterson, D. Dai, et al., Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography, New England Journal of Medicine 362 (2010) 886-895. Go to original source...
  13. K. Levitt, H. Guo, H.C. Wijeysundera, et al., Predictors of normal coronary arteries at coronary angiography, American Heart Journal 166 (2013) 694-700. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. P. Jousilahti, T. Laatikainen, M. Peltonen, et al., Primary prevention and risk factor reduction in coronary heart disease mortality among working aged men and women in eastern Finland over 40 years: population based observational study, British Medical Journal 352 (2016) i721. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. M. Amiri, F. Janssen, A.E. Kunst, et al., The decline in ischaemic heart disease mortality in seven European countries: exploration of future trends, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 65 (2011) 676-681. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. G.A. Diamond, J.S. Forrester, Analysis of probability as an aid in the clinical diagnosis of coronary artery disease, New England Journal of Medicine 300 (1979) 1350-1358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. D.B. Pryor, F.E. Harrell Jr, K.L. Lee, et al., Estimating the likelihood of significant coronary artery disease, American Journal of Medicine 75 (1983) 71-80. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. D.B. Pryor, L. Shaw, C.B. McCants, et al., Value of the history and physical in identifying patients in increased risks for coronary artery disease, Annals of Internal Medicine 118 (1993) 81-90. Go to original source...
  19. I.M. Graham, Diagnosing coronary artery disease - the Diamond and Forrester model revisited, European Heart Journal 32 (2011) 1311-1312. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. G.S. Collins, D.G. Altman, Predicting the 10 year risk of cardiovascular disease in the United Kingdom: independent and external validation of an updated version of QRISK2, British Medical Journal 344 (2012) e4181. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. R. Detrano, J. Yiannikas, E.E. Salcedo, et al., Bayesan probability analysis: a prospective demonstration of its clinical utility in diagnosis coronary artery disease, Circulation 69 (1984) 541-547. Go to original source...
  22. A.B. Mosquera, J. Peteiro, F.J. Broullón, et al., Temporary changes in the use and results of exercise echocardiography, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 16 (2015) 1207-1212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. R. Chelliah, B. Anantharam, L. Burden, et al., Independent and incremental value of stress echocardiography over clinical and stress electrocardiographic parameters for the prediction of hard cardiac events in new onset suspected angina with no history of coronary artery disease, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 11 (2010) 875-882. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. K. Mědílek, J. Nový, V. Engelmann, et al., Investigation of patients with angina like chest pain according to ESC/ČKS 2013/2014 guidelines in District Hospital Jičín, Nukleární medicína 4 (2015) 18 (S1).
  25. K. Zacharias, A. Ahmed, B.N. Shah, et al., Relative clinical and economic impact of exercise echocardiography vs. exercise electrocardiography, as first line investigation in patients without known coronary artery disease and new stable angina: a randomized prospective study, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 18 (2017) 195-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. T.S.S. Genders, S.E. Petersen, F. Pugliese, et al., The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis, Annals of Internal Medicine 162 (2015) 474-484. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. E.G. Bertoldi, S.F. Stella, L.E.P. Rohde, et al., Cost-effectiveness of anatomical and functional test strategies for stable chest pain: public health perspective from a middle-income country, British Medical Journal Open 7 (2017) e012652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. T.S.S. Genders, E.W. Steyerberg, H. Alkadhi, et al., A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating and extension, European Heart Journal 32 (2011) 1316-1330. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.