Cor Vasa 2017, 59(1):e17-e22 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.01.023

Management of low-gradient aortic stenosis

Martin Mates*, Karel Kopřiva
Kardiologické oddělení, Komplexní kardiovaskulární centrum, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha, Česká republika

There is an important proportion of patients with significant aortic stenosis who present with low gradient. In clinical practice we distinguish three subpopulations: (1) "classical" type with low left ventricular ejection fraction, (2) paradoxical type with preserved ventricular ejection fraction and (3) patients with normal flow and low gradient. Differentiation between "true" severe aortic stenosis and pseudostenosis by means of low dose dobutamine stress test is sometimes necessary in order to set further management - operative or conservative respectively. Use of other imaging methods such as MSCT, proved also valuable. Intervention of severe aortic stenosis in such cases is considered to be superior with regards to survival, though very high operative risk in some subgroups, typically for patients with low ejection fraction, has been reported.

Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Aortic valve replacement; Echocardiography; Low flow; Low gradient; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Received: October 21, 2016; Accepted: January 12, 2017; Published: February 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mates M, Kopřiva K. Management of low-gradient aortic stenosis. Cor Vasa. 2017;59(1):e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.01.023.
Download citation

References

  1. B. Iung, G. Baron, E.G. Butchart, et al., A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease, European Heart Journal 24 (2003) 1231-1243. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. R.A. Nishimura, C.M. Otto, R.O. Bonow, et al., and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, Journal of American College of Cardiology 63 (2014) e57-e185. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. A. Vahanian, O. Alfieri, F. Andreotti, et al., Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012), European Heart Journal 33 (2012) 2451-2496. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. J.G. Dumesnil, P. Pibarot, B. Carabello, Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment, European Heart Journal 31 (2010) 281-289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. H.M. Connolly, J.K. Oh, T.A. Orszulak, et al., Aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Prognostic indicators, Circulation 95 (1997) 2395-2400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. H.M. Connolly, J.K. Oh, H.V. Schaff, et al., Severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradient and severe left ventricular dysfunction: result of aortic valve replacement in 52 patients, Circulation 101 (2000) 1940-1946. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. F. Le Ven, C. Thébault, A. Dahou, et al., Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Heart 101 (2015) 1196-1203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. J.L. Monin, J.P. Quéré, M. Monchi, et al., Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics, Circulation 108 (2003) 319-324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. J.P. Quere, J.L. Monin, F. Levy, et al., Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis, Circulation 113 (2006) 1738-1744. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. J.J. Pereira, M.S. Lauer, M. Bashir, et al., Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 39 (2002) 1356-1363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Y. Elhmidi, N. Piazza, M. Krane, et al., Clinical presentation and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low flow/low gradient severe aortic stenosis, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 84 (2014) 283-290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. M.A. Clavel, I.G. Burwash, G. Mundigler, et al., Validation of conventional and simplified methods to calculate projected valve area at normal flow rate in patients with low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOP (True or Pseudo Severe Aortic Stenosis) study, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 23 (2010) 380-386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. C. Cueff, J.M. Serfaty, C. Cimadevilla, et al., Measurement of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography: correlation with haemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis and clinical implication for patients with low ejection fraction, Heart 97 (2011) 721-726. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. M.A. Clavel, D. Messika-Zeitoun, P. Pibarot, et al., The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 62 (2013) 2329-2338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. M.A. Clavel, P. Pibarot, Assessment of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: multimodality imaging is the key to success, EuroIntervention 10 (Suppl U) (2014) U52-U60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. O. Aksoy, A. Cam, S. Agarwal, et al., Significance of aortic valve calcification in patients with low-gradient low-flow aortic stenosis, Clinical Cardiology 37 (2014) 26-31. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. J. Bergler-Klein, G. Mundigler, P. Pibarot, et al., B-type natriuretic peptide in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: relationship to hemodynamics and clinical outcome: results from the Multicenter Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis (TOPAS) study, Circulation 115 (2007) 2848-2855. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. S. Herrmann, S. Störk, M. Niemann, et al., Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis myocardial fibrosis and its influence on function and outcome, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58 (2011) 402-412. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. M.A. Clavel, P.V. Ennezat, S. Maréchaux, et al., Stress echocardiography to assess stenosis severity and predict outcome in patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis and preserved LVEF, JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging 6 (2013) 175-183. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. A. Ozkan, R. Hachamovitch, S.R. Kapadia, et al., Impact of aortic valve replacement on outcome of symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, Circulation 128 (2013) 622-631. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. C. Tribouilloy, D. Rusinaru, S. Maréchaux, et al., Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 65 (2015) 55-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. V. Dayan, G. Vignolo, J. Magne, et al., Outcome and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Preserved LVEF and Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 66 (2015) 2594-2603. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. N. Jander, J. Minners, I. Holme, et al., Outcome of patients with low-gradient "severe" aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction, Circulation 123 (2011) 887-895. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. A. Lauten, H.R. Figulla, H. Möllmann, et al., GARY Executive Board, TAVI for low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved or reduced ejection fraction: a subgroup analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY), EuroIntervention 10 (2014) 850-859. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. A. Lauten, R. Zahn, M. Horack, et al., German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions Registry Investigators, Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis, JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions 5 (2012) 552-559. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. H.C. Herrmann, P. Pibarot, I. Hueter, et al., Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis, Circulation 127 (2013) 2316-2326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. D.H. Kang, J.Y. Jang, S.J. Park, et al., Watchful observation versus early aortic valve replacement for symptomatic patients with normal flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis, Heart 101 (2015) 1375-1381. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. F. Le Ven, C. Thébault, A. Dahou, et al., Evolution and prognostic impact of low flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement, Heart 101 (2015) 1196-1203. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. M.A. Clavel, J. Magne, P. Pibarot, Low-gradient aortic stenosis, European Heart Journal 37 (2016) 2645-2657. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.