Cor Vasa 2016, 58(2):e238-e241 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2016.02.004

Impact of different perioperative intraluminal shunt insertion methods on final patient outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in a sample of 250 patients

Pavel Hanineca, Filip Šámala,*, Tomáš Peiskerb, Richard Brzeznyc
a Neurochirurgická klinika, 3. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha, Česká republika
b Neurologická klinika, 3. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha, Česká republika
c Neurologické oddělení, Oblastní nemocnice Kladno, Kladno, Česká republika

Background and purpose: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common and effective surgical method of stroke prevention. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia and is usually accompanied by simultaneous intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring. If a more than 50% decrease in N20/P25 SEP wave amplitude in 3 or more recordings occurs during surgery, a shunt is inserted. Shunt surgery is associated with higher risk of vessel wall injury and possible central embolization. In an effort to minimize the number of shunted patients, we modified shunt insertion timing criteria according to intraoperative SEP changes and reviewed a sample of patients for whom this modified approach was utilized.

Methods: 250 patients (171 males, 79 females, mean age = 67.00 years ± 8.55 SD, max. 86, min. 45) indicated for CEA were retrospectively enrolled in the study. Shunting criteria included long-term loss of SEP that was not affected by full anesthesia with elevated mean arterial pressure and increased sedation. Neurological complications (measured as changes in NIHSS) were recorded and compared.

Results: The overall incidence of perioperative adverse events (i.e. stroke/death) following CEA was 2.8% (2.0 and 0.8% in 5 and 2 patients, respectively). A drop in SEP was observed in 68 cases (27.2%). Early persistent declines in cortical response amplitude that developed into complete persistent SEP amplitude loss resulted in shunt placement in 5 cases (2.0%). Perioperative neurological complications were observed in all patients and independently of intraoperative SEP response development (2.9% in patients with SEP loss vs. 2.7% in the remainder of the sample, p = 0.79).

Conclusion: Surgery with modified shunt insertion timing demonstrated standard results. Due to the potential for vessel wall injury and embolization it is crucial to pay attention to shunt insertion timing in accordance with the individual course of surgery and intraoperative SEP development.

Keywords: Carotid artery shunting; Carotid endarterectomy; Periprocedural stroke; Somatosensory evoked potentials

Received: January 6, 2016; Accepted: February 9, 2016; Published: April 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Haninec P, Šámal F, Peisker T, Brzezny R. Impact of different perioperative intraluminal shunt insertion methods on final patient outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in a sample of 250 patients. Cor Vasa. 2016;58(2):e238-241. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2016.02.004.
Download citation

References

  1. S. Chaturvedi, A. Bruno, T. Feasby, et al., Carotid endarterectomy - an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, Neurology 65 (2005) 794-801. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. K.L. Furie, S.E. Kasner, R.J. Adams, et al., Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, Stroke 42 (2011) 227-276. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. The European Stroke Organisation (ESO), ESO Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke Update 2009, 2009, http://www.eso-stroke.org/ (9. 3. 2013).
  4. M. Gunel, I.A. Awad, Carotid endarterectomy prevention strategies and complications management, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 11 (2000) 351-364. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. S. Moritz, P. Kasprzak, M. Arlt, et al., Accuracy of cerebral monitoring in detecting cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of transcranial Doppler sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, stump pressure, and somatosensory evoked potentials, Anesthesiology 107 (2007) 563-569. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. L. Stejskal, F. Kramar, S. Ostry, et al., Experience of 500 cases of neurophysiological monitoring in carotid endarterectomy, Acta Neurochirurgica (Wien) 149 (2007) 681-688. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. N. Matsumiya, R.C. Koehler, R.J. Traystman, Consistency of cerebral blood flow and evoked potential alterations with reversible focal ischemia in cats, Stroke 21 (1990) 908-916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. A. Amantini, M. Bartelli, G. de Scisciolo, et al., Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy, Journal of Neurology 239 (1992) 241-247. Go to original source...
  9. M. Orlicky, P. Vachata, R. Bartos, M. Sames, Intraluminal shunt in carotid endarterectomies increases the risk of ischemic stroke, Ceska a Slovenska Neurologie a Neurochirurgie 78 (2015) 163-166. Go to original source...
  10. M. Orlicky, P. Vachata, R. Bartos, et al., A selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy: prospective MR DWI monitoring of embolization in a group of 754 patients, Journal of Neurological Surgery. Part A: Central European Neurosurgery 76 (2015) 89-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. J.L. Smith, D.H. Evans, L. Fan, et al., Interpretation of embolic phenomena during carotid endarterectomy, Stroke 26 (1995) 2281-2284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. M.K. Gumerlock, E.A. Neuwelt, Carotid endarterectomy: to shunt or not to shunt, Stroke 19 (1988) 1485-1490. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. P. Cao, G. Giordano, S. Zannetti, et al., Transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: is it appropriate for selecting patients in need of a shunt, Journal of Vascular Surgery 26 (1997) 973-979. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. J. Cho, K.K. Lee, W.S. Yun, et al., Selective shunt during carotid endarterectomy using routine awake test with respect to a lower shunt rate, Journal of the Korean Surgical Society 84 (2013) 238-244. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. K. Rerkasem, P.M. Rothwell, Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2009) CD000190. Go to original source...
  16. G. Florence, J.M. Guerit, B. Gueguen, Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to prevent cerebral ischaemia in the operating room, Neurophysiologie Clinique 34 (2004) 17-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. J.M. Guerit, Intraoperative monitoring during carotid endarterectomy, in: Handbook of Clinical Neurophysiology. Intraoperative Monitoring of Neural Function, Elsevier, 2008, pp. 776-790. Go to original source...
  18. W.J. Messick, J.J. Ricotta, M.H. Charlton, et al., Benefits, shortcomings, and costs of EEG monitoring, Annals of Surgery 201 (1985) 785-792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, Methods, patient characteristics, and progress, Stroke 22 (1991) 711-720. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), Lancet 351 (1998) 1379-1387.
  21. G.G. Ferguson, M. Eliasziw, H.W. Barr, et al., The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients, Stroke 30 (1999) 1751-1758. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.