Cor Vasa 2015, 57(2):e91-e94 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2015.03.001

Value of autopsy in cardiac surgery

Petr Němec*, Petr Fila, Jan Štěrba, Jiří Černošek
Centrum kardiovaskulární a transplantační chirurgie, Brno, Česká republika

Introduction: With improvements in preoperative diagnostics and postoperative care the value of autopsy has been questioned. The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the current value of autopsy in patients after cardiac surgery.

Methods: Between January 2007 and December 2013 there were 7 800 patients operated on for heart disease. Two hundred and thirteen of them died postoperatively, resulting in an overall in-hospital mortality of 2.7%. Autopsy was performed on 158 patients (74%). Data regarding the cause of death from clinical and autopsy findings were analysed and compared.

Results: Artificial ventilation, inotropic support before operation, NYHA class IV, and renal failure were the most common preoperative risk factors and surgery for postinfarction ventricular septal defect, emergency operation, operation for acute dissection, triple valve surgery and the necessity for circulatory arrest were the most significant operative risk factors. The most frequent cause of death was cardiac failure or a sepsis and/or multiorgan failure. Missed major diagnosis (class I and II) was found in 21 patients (13.3%) and missed minor diagnosis was found in 17 patients (10.4%). Of the seven patients with class I error, six died due to unidentified abdominal complications.

Conclusion: Autopsy remains the most specific indicator of errors in diagnostics and surgery in patients with cardiac disease. It is a valuable tool for quality assessment and may contribute to the improvement of patient healthcare. Clinicians should pay special attention to abdominal symptomatology in patients after cardiac surgery because this was the main cause of diagnostic errors.

Keywords: Autopsy; Cardiac surgery; Cause of death; Risk factors

Received: February 23, 2015; Accepted: March 1, 2015; Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Němec P, Fila P, Štěrba J, Černošek J. Value of autopsy in cardiac surgery. Cor Vasa. 2015;57(2):e91-94. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2015.03.001.
Download citation

References

  1. D.E. Newman-Toker, P.J. Pronovost, Diagnostic errors - the next frontier for patient safety, JAMA 301 (10) (2009) 1060-1062. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. L. Goldman, R. Sayson, S. Robbins, et al., The value of the autopsy in three medical eras, New England Journal of Medicine 308 (1983) 1000-1005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. K.G. Shojania, E.C. Burton, K.M. McDonald, L. Goldman, Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates, Quality and Safety in Health Care 14 (2005) 408-413. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. J.L. Burton, J. Underwood, Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy, Lancet 369 (2007) 1471-1480. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. K.G. Shojania, E.C. Burton, K.M. McDonald, L. Goldman, Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review, JAMA 289 (2003) 2849-2856. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. B. Winters, J. Custer, S.M. Galvagno Jr., et al., Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies, BMJ Quality and Safety 21 (2012) 894-902. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. J.J. Stambouly, E. Kahn, R.A. Boxer, Correlation between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in critically ill children, Pediatrics 92 (1993) 248-251. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. S. Fröhlich, O. Ryan, N. Murphy, et al., Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis in liver transplant recipients - a case series, Acta Gastroenterologica Belgica 76 (2013) 429-432.
  9. P. Mendes da Costa, C. De Prez, Is there still a role for autopsy in abdominal surgery in 2008? Acta Chirurgica Belgica 109 (2009) 171-175. Go to PubMed...
  10. A.J. Rastan, J.F. Gummert, N. Lachmann, et al., Significant value of autopsy for quality management in cardiac surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 129 (2005) 1292-1300. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. M. Deiwick, A. Löhrer, A. Hoffmeier, et al., Postoperative death should be followed by autopsy - an analysis of the autopsy findings of the years 1990 and 1991 in a heart surgery center, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 47 (1999) 82-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. D. Wichmann, A. Heinemann, C. Weinberg, et al., Virtual autopsy with multiphase postmortem computed tomographic angiography versus traditional medical autopsy to investigate unexpected deaths of hospitalized patients: a cohort study, Annals of Internal Medicine 160 (2014) 534-541. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. P. Nemec, V. Bruk, R. Hajek, P. Flodr, Clinical outcome versus post-mortem finding in cardiac surgery, Cor et Vasa 48 (2006) 85-88. Go to original source...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.