Cor Vasa 2012, 54(11-12):e408-e413 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.11.016

Robot-assisted navigation in atrial fibrillation ablation - of any benefits?

Jan Petrů*, Jan Škoda
Kardiologické oddělení, Kardiocentrum, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha, Česká republika

In recent years, catheter ablation has established itself as a safe and effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). The benefits of robotic catheter navigation technology and techniques for AF ablation are currently a frequent topic of discussion. Most clinical trials have suggested that robotic ablation is (at least) as effective as the manual approach. The most important potential advantages of robotic ablation include excellent catheter stability and accuracy of its movement, reduced fluoroscopic time, catheter contact monitoring, improved comfort of the operator during the procedure as they can sit most of the time unexposed to radiation and, last but not least, a very short learning curve potentially allowing for more complicated procedures (persistent forms of AF, structural ventricular tachycardias, congenital heart disease).

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Remote navigation

Received: November 23, 2012; Revised: November 27, 2012; Accepted: November 27, 2012; Published: November 1, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Petrů J, Škoda J. Robot-assisted navigation in atrial fibrillation ablation - of any benefits? Cor Vasa. 2012;54(11-12):e408-413. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.11.016.
Download citation

References

  1. K.R. Chun, B. Schmidt, B. Köktürk, et al., Catheter ablation - new developments in robotics, Herz 33 (2008) 586-589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. R. Cappato, H. Calkins, S.A. Chen, et al., Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation, Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 3 (2010) 32-38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. A.J. Camm, G.Y. Lip, R. De Caterina, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. An update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation, European Heart Journal 33 (2012) 2719-2747. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. C. Pappone, G, Augello, S, Sala, A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: The APAF study, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 48 (2006) 2340-2347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. D.J. Wilber, C. Pappone, P. Neuzil, et al., Thermocool AF Trial investigators. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial, the Journal of the American Medical Association 303 (2010) 333-340. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. H. Oral, C. Pappone, A. Chugh, et al., Circumferential pulmonary-vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. The New England Journal of Medicine 354 (2006) 934 -941. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. L. Di Biase, T.S. Fahmy, D. Patel, et al., Remote magnetic navigation: human experience in pulmonary vein ablation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 50 (2007) 868-874. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. J. Kautzner, P. Peichl, P. Hlivák, R. Čihák, Robotická navigace katetrizační ablace fibrilace síní, Cor et Vasa 52 (2010) 25-29. Go to original source...
  9. D. Steven, H. Servatius, T. Rostock, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 21 (2010) 6-12. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. J.D. Burkhardt, et al. Remote navigation and electroanatomic mapping in the pericardial space. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics 2 (2010) 121-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. S. Miyazaki, A.J. Shah, O. Xhaët, et al. Remote magnetic navigation with irrigated tip catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 3 (2010) 585-589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. L. Di Biase, Y. Wang, R. Horton, et al., Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 20 (2009) 1328-1335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. T. Dieto, EP Scholz, P.A. Schweizer, et al., Initial experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent fibrillation, Journal of Electrocardiology 45 (2012) 95-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. A. Rillig, U. Meyerfeldt, R. Birkemeyer, et al., Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. How fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned? Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 29 (2010) 109-117. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. A. Arya, R. Zaker-Shahrak, P. Sommer, et al., Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case-control study, Europace 13 (2011) 45-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. J. Bradfield, R. Tung, R. Mandapati, et al., Catheter ablation utilizing remote magnetic navigation: a review of applications and outcomes, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 35 (2012) 1021-1034 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. W.T. Katsiyiannis, D.P. Melby, J.L. Matelski, et al., Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation, American Journal of Cardiology 102 (2008) 1674-1676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. A. Da Costa, P. Lafond, C. Romeyer-Bouchard, et al., Remote magnetic navigation and arrhythmia ablation, Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 105 (2012) 446-453. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. L. Lüthje, D. Vollmann, J. Seegers, et al., Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation, Clinical Research in Cardiology 100 (2011) 1003-1011 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. A. Sorgente, G.B. Chierchia, L. Capulzini, et al., Atrial fibrillation: a single center comparison between remote magnetic navigation, cryoballoon and conventional manual pulmonary vein isolation, Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal 11 (2010) 486-495.
  21. L. Lüthje, D. Vollmann, J. Seegers, et al., Interference of remote magnetic catheter navigation and ablation with implanted devices for pacing and defibrillation, Europace 12 (2010) 1574-1580. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. P. Hlivák, H. Mlčochová, P. Peichl, et al., Robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: midterm efficacy and predictor of postablation arrhythmia recurrences, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 22 (2011) 534-540. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. A.M. Kim, M. Turakhia, J. Lu, et al., Impact of remote magnetic catheter navigation on ablation fluoroscopy and procedure time, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 31 (2008) 1399-1404. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. C. Eitel, G. Hindricks, P. Sommer, et al., Safety of remote magnetic navigation in patients with pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 21 (2010) 1130-1135. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. C. Pappone, G. Vicedomini, F. Manguso, et al., Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 47 (2006) 1390-1400. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. W. Saliba, V.Y. Reddy, O. Wazni, et al., Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 51 (2008) 2407-2411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. F. Akca, T. Bauernfeind, M. Witsenburg, et al., Acute and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation in patients with congenital heart disease, American Journal of Cardiology 110 (2012) 409-414. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. D. Steven, T. Rostock, H. Servatius, et al., Robotic versus conventional ablation for common-type atrial flutter: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of remote catheter navigation, Heart Rhythm 5 (2008) 1556-1560. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.