Cor Vasa 2011, 53(12):693-697 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2011.172

Benefit of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring and identification of volume therapy responders in intensive care

Pavel Folwarczny1,*, Martin Hutyra1, David Vindiš1, Karel Axmann2, Miloš Táborský1
1 I. interní klinika - kardiologická, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc, Olomouc
2 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Lékařská fakulta Univerzity Palackého a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc, Olomouc, Česká republika

Echocardiographic methods may help the intensivist to determine the need for fluid infusion in patients with hemodynamic failure. Very low static parameters are usually associated with fluid responsiveness. But these static parameters fail to predict a positive response in patients with suspected hypovolemia. Dynamic parameters should, therefore, be preferred. The intensivist may use respiratory variation of the inferior vena cava, aortic blood flow, or stroke volume determined by echocardiography and changes in stroke volume or aortic velocity time integral following the provocation maneuver (passive leg-raising or volume challenge test) to identify volume responsiveness.

Published: December 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Folwarczny P, Hutyra M, Vindiš D, Axmann K, Táborský M. Benefit of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring and identification of volume therapy responders in intensive care. Cor Vasa. 2011;53(12):693-697. doi: 10.33678/cor.2011.172.
Download citation

References

  1. Shah MR, Haselblad V, Stevenson LW, et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2005;294:1664-1670. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:472-477. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Sadham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:5-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Binanay C, Califf RM, Haselblad V, et al. Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness: the ESCAPE trial. JAMA 2005;294:1625-1633. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomized, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445] Crit Care 2005;9:687-693. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bouchard J., Soroko SB, Chertow GM, et al. Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney fiction in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2009;76:422-427. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2007;13: 549-553. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network, Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2564-2575. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Maizel J, Airapetian N, Lorne E, et al. Diagnosis of central hypovolemia by using passive leg raising. Intens Care Med 2007;33:1133-1138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intens Care Med 2007;33:1125-1132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, et al. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1402-1407. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Ultrasonographic examination of the venae cavae. Intens Care Med 2006;32:203-206. Go to original source...
  13. Lee KS, Abbas AE, Khandheria BK, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of right heart hemodynamic parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:773-782. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Hutyra M, Skála T, Ostřanský J, et al. Predikce plnicích tlaků levé komory srdeční pomocí tkáňové dopplerovské echokardiografie v intenzivní péči. Cor Vasa 2006;48:180-185. Go to original source...
  15. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2006;32:691-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Diwan A, McCulloch M, Lawrie GM, et al. Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with mitral valve disease. Circulation 2005;111:3281-3289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Dokainish H, Zoghbi WA, Lakkis NM, el al. Optimal noninvasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparison of tissue doppler echocardiography and B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with pulmonary artery catheters. Circulation 2004;109:2432-2439. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Omen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, el al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventriculat filling pressures. Circulation 2000;102:1788-1794. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, et al. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001;119:867-873. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intens Care Med 2004;30:1734-1739. Go to original source...
  21. Barbier C, Loubieres Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intens Care Med 2004;30:1740-1746. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intens Care Med 2007;33:1125-1132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Backer D, Cholley BP, Slama M, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring using echocardiography in the critically ill. Berlin - Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2011. Go to original source...
  24. Robson SC, Murray A, Peart I, et al. Reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by cross sectional and Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1988;59:680-684. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.