Cor Vasa 2010, 52(7-8):447-452 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2010.119

Timing and selection of the type of revascularization procedure in acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation with multivessel coronary artery disease

Petr Hájek
Kardiologické oddělení, Kardiovaskulární centrum, Fakultní nemocnice Motol, Česká republika

Most patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are treated with success by early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, selection of proper timing and type of revascularization procedure may prove to be difficult. Critical considerations in this context include the patient's clinical status, their risk profile, nature, and extent of coronary involvement. The pivotal role in this process is played by the interventional cardiologist assessing the findings on the coronary arteries. Any attempted treatment of the culprit lesion may significantly affect the type of revascularization eventually employed. In some patients, an alternative to PCI and surgical revascularization is a hybrid procedure. Data from large registries suggest surgical revascularization in stable patients after NSTE-ACS should be preferably deferred by at least a week. No randomized studies addressing the optimal revascularization strategy in these patients have apparently been published to date.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Surgical revascularization

Published: July 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hájek P. Timing and selection of the type of revascularization procedure in acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation with multivessel coronary artery disease. Cor Vasa. 2010;52(7-8):447-452. doi: 10.33678/cor.2010.119.
Download citation

References

  1. Zapata GO, Lasave LI, Kozak F, et al. Culprit-only or multivessel percutaneous coronary stenting in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: one-year follow-up. J Interv Cardiol 2009;22:329-335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Brener SJ, Milford-Beland S, Roe MT, et al. American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry. Culprit-only or multivessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes: an American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Database Registry report. Am Heart J 2008;155:140-146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bavry AA, Kumbhani DJ, Rassi AN, et al. Benefit of early invasive therapy in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1319-1325. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. de Winter RJ, Windhausen F, Cornel JH, et al.; Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) Investigators. Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1095-1104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of Unstable Angina. Lancet 2002;360:743-751. Go to original source...
  6. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet 1999;354:708-715.
  7. Bjessmo S, Ivert T, Flink H, Hammar N. Early and late mortality after surgery for unstable angina in relation to Braunwald class. Am Heart J 2001; 141:9-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Braxton JH, Hammond GL, Letsou GV, et al. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995;92:II66-II68. Go to original source...
  9. Cesena FH, Favarato D, César LA, et al. Cardiac complications during waiting for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery: incidence, temporal distribution and predictive factors. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;25: 196-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Sobolev BG, Kuramoto L, Levy AR, Hayden R. Cumulative incidence for wait-list death in relation to length of queue for coronary-artery bypass grafting: a cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;1:21. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Koomen EM, Hutten BA, Kelder JC, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients waiting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:260-265. Go to original source...
  12. Koivula M, Paunonen-Ilmonen M, Tarkka MT, et al. Fear and anxiety in patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Lung 2001;30:302-311. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Doyle F, Conroy R, McGee H, Delaney M. Depressive symptoms in persons with acute coronary syndrome: specific symptom scales and prognosis. J Psychosom Res 2010;68:121-130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Hamm CW, Braunwald E. A classification of unstable angina revisited. Circulation 2000;102:118-122. Go to original source...
  15. Savonitto S, Ardissino D, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic value of the admission electrocardiogram in acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 1999;281: 707-713. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Task Force for Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes of European Society of Cardiology, Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2007;28:1598-1660. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Eagle KA, Lim MJ, Dabbous OH, et al. GRACE Investigators. A validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry. JAMA 2004;291:2727-2733. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Antman EM, Cohen M, Bernink PJ, et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: a method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. JAMA 2000;284:835-842. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al.; SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 2006;295:2511-2515. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Hoenig MR, Doust JA, Aroney CN, Scott IA. Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina & non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD004815. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Cannon CP. Revascularisation for everyone? Eur Heart J 2004;25: 1471-1472. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Thielmann M, Massoudy P, Neuhäuser M, et al. Prognostic value of preoperative cardiac troponin I in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2005;128:3526-3536. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Thielmann M, Massoudy P, Neuhäuser M, et al. Risk stratification with cardiac troponin I in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:861-869. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Lee DC, Oz MC, Weinberg AD, Ting W. Appropriate timing of surgical intervention after transmural acute myocardial infarction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:115-119. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Voisine P, Mathieu P, Doyle D, et al. Influence of time elapsed between myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery on operative mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29:319-323. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Jedrzkiewicz S, Goodman SG, Yan RT, et al. Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE2). Temporal trends in the use of invasive cardiac procedures for non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes according to initial risk stratification. Can J Cardiol 2009;25:e370-e376. Go to original source...
  27. Levine GN, Lincoff AM, Ferguson JJ 3rd, et al. Utilization of catheterization and revascularization procedures in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome over the last decade. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005;66:149-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Crawford MH, et al. Outcomes in patients with acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction randomly assigned to an invasive as compared with a conservative management strategy. Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies in Hospital (VANQWISH) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1785-1792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Anderson HV, Cannon CP, Stone PH, et al. One-year results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB clinical trial. A randomized comparison of tissue-type plasminogen activator versus placebo and early invasive versus early conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:1643-1650. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, et al. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 2005;1:219-227. Go to PubMed...
  31. Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, et al. ARTS II. Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1072-1081. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Lemesle G, Bonello L, de Labriolle A, et al. Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:612-617. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al.; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360:213-224. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Hochholzer W, Buettner HJ, Trenk D, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting as primary revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2008;102:173-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Lenzen MJ, Boersma E, Bertrand ME, et al.; European Society of Cardiology. Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J 2005;26:1169-1179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Dangas G, Mehran R, Wallenstein S, et al. Correlation of angiographic morphology and clinical presentation in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:519-525. Go to original source...
  37. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al.; SYNTAX Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009;360:961-972. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Shishehbor MH, Lauer MS, Singh IM, et al. In unstable angina or non-ST-segment acute coronary syndrome, should patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergo multivessel or culprit-only stenting? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:849-854. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Reicher B, Poston RS, Mehra MR, et al. Simultaneous "hybrid" percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes. Am Heart J 2008;155:661-667. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, et al. Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1856-1860. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Vassiliades TA Jr, Douglas JS, Morris DC et al. Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: immediate and seven-month outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;131:956-962. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Morgan CD, Sykora K, Naylor CD. Analysis of deaths while waiting for cardiac surgery among 29,293 consecutive patients in Ontario, Canada. The Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario. Heart 1998;79:345-349. Go to original source...
  43. Rexius H, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Odén A, et al. Mortality on the waiting list for coronary artery bypass grafting: incidence and risk factors. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:769-774. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ 1997;314:131-134. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Rexius H, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Nilsson J, et al. A simple score to assess mortality risk in patients waiting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:577-582. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, et al. Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Long-term CASS experience. Circulation 1995;91:2325-2334. Go to original source...
  47. Légaré JF, MacLean A, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA. Assessing the risk of waiting for coronary artery bypass graft surgery among patients with stenosis of the left main coronary artery. CMAJ 2005;173:371-375. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Pitt M, Dutka D, Pagano D, et al. The natural history of myocardium awaiting revascularisation in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Eur Heart J 2004;25:500-507. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Rexius H, Brandrup-Wognsen G, Odén A, Jeppsson A. Waiting time and mortality after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:538-543. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Ray AA, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA, et al. Waiting for cardiac surgery: results of a risk-stratified queuing process. Circulation 2001;104:I92-I98. Go to original source...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.