Cor Vasa 2008, 50(12):470-472 | DOI: 10.33678/cor.2008.171

Ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial injury: differential diagnosis using post-contrast delayed magnetic resonance imaging scans

Josef Vymazal*, Jiří Weichet, Jan Balák
Radiodiagnostické oddělení, Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha, Česká republika

The rapid development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has had an impact also in cardiology and cardiac surgery. Use of delayed scans following contrast agent administration allows to detect myocardial scars, distinguish subendo-cardial from transmural injury and, also, to detect non-ischemic myocardial injury. While non-ischemic myocardial injury tends to be central and non-coalescent, ischemic myocardial injury is either subendocardial or transmural in nature, very often combining both types, whereby a transmural scar turns into a subendocardial lesion. The ischemic nature of injury respects vascular territories. Non-ischemic myocardial injury, as evidenced by delayed scans following contrast agent administration, is exemplified by myocarditides, right ventricular arrhythmogenic dysplasias, and various forms of cardiomyopathies.

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Contrast agent; Myocardium

Published: December 1, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vymazal J, Weichet J, Balák J. Ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial injury: differential diagnosis using post-contrast delayed magnetic resonance imaging scans. Cor Vasa. 2008;50(12):470-472. doi: 10.33678/cor.2008.171.
Download citation

References

  1. Kuhl HP, Beek AM, van der Weerdt AP, et al. Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1341-8. Go to original source...
  2. Krombach GA, Niendorf T, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH. Characterization of myocardial viability using MR and CT imaging. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1433-44. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Atlas SW. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2001.
  4. Bongartz G. Imaging in the time of NFD/NSF: do we have to change our routines concerning renal insufficiency? Magma 2007;20:57-62. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bongartz G, Mayr M, Bilecen D. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in renally impaired patients: when and how. Eur J Radiol 2008;66:213-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Kacmaz F, Ozbulbul NI, Alyan O, et al. Imaging of coronary artery anomalies: the role of multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis 2008;19:203-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Plumhans C, Muhlenbruch G, Rapaee A, et al. Assessment of global right ventricular function on 64-MDCT compared with MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190: 1358-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Lim RP, Srichai MB, Lee VS. Non-ischemic causes of delayed myocardial hyperenhancement on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1675-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Gottlieb I, Macedo R, Bluemke DA, Lima JA. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of non-ischemic cardiomyopathies: current applications and future perspectives. Heart Fail Rev 2006;11:313-23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Kim DH, Choi SI, Chang HJ, Choi DJ, Lim C, Park JH. Delayed hyperenhancement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical application for various cardiac diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:226-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.