Cor Vasa 2004, 45(4):157-166

Acute Q-wave myocardial infarction and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation

Stanislav Cagáň1,2,*, Soňa Wimmerová1, Ivana Besedová1,2, Tomáš Trnovec1
1 Ústav preventívnej a klinickej medicíny
2 Slovenská zdravotnícka univerzita, Bratislava, Slovenská republika

Aim of study:
The aim of the study was to compare, in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the demographic, medical history and clinical data of patients with acute Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and to examine the rationale for such classification.


Group of patients and method:
The project was carried out as a prospective multicenter study. Independent audit and data collection involved a total of 3,123 AMI patients in 66 centers from 16 September 1997 through 15 September 1998.

Results:
When comparing a subgroup of patients with acute Q-wave and non-Q-wave MI, the most striking differences (p £ 0.001) were seen in:
1. Diagnosis on admission. A diagnosis of AMI was established more often in patients with acute Q-wave MI. A diagnosis of suspected AMI, even recurrent AMI, was more frequent in patients with acute non-Q-wave MI.
2. More frequent treatment with acetylsalicylic acid in the history of patients with acute non-Q-wave MI.
3. A higher likelihood of successful thrombolytic therapy (TT) in patients with acute non-Q-wave MI.
4. Longer overall hospitalization time of patients with acute Q-wave MI, which, in fact, was only one day longer in patients with acute Q-wave MI compared with those with acute non-Q-wave MI. The most important end point, overall in-hospital mortality, was higher (p £ 0.05) in acute Q-wave MI patients (13.3%) compared with acute-non-Q-wave MI patients (10.3%). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients receiving TT and its initiation within versus after four hours.

Conclusion:
The appropriateness of classification of patients with ST-segment elevation into patients with acute Q-wave MI and those with non-Q-wave MI is only justified by the different in-hospital mortality. Acetylsalicylic acid administration prior to the development of an AMI significantly increases the proportion of acute non-Q-wave MI patients. The higher success rates of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute non-Q-wave MI may reflect the fact that Q wave development was prevented in a proportion of patients with ST-segment elevation.

Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; Electrocardiogram; Acute Q-wave infarction; Acute non-Q-wave infarction; Audit; Slovakia

Published: April 1, 2004  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cagáň S, Wimmerová S, Besedová I, Trnovec T. Acute Q-wave myocardial infarction and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in patients with ST-segment elevation. Cor Vasa. 2004;45(4):157-166.
Download citation




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.