Cor Vasa 2003, 44(5):269-274

The evolution of knowledge about the pulmonary circulation II. Twentieth century

Martin Riedel
Deutsches Herzzentrum und I. Medizinische Klinik, Technische Universität München, Německo

This review describes briefly and with admitted biases the progress achieved in the first half of the 20th century in our understanding of the structure and function of the pulmonary circulation. The technical developments have been truly remarkable and match the maturity of both cardiology and pneumology as independent specialties of internal medicine. Both specialties meet again in the field of pulmonary circulation. The pulmonary circulation is now known to be more than a passive system of pipes, and something is understood of the factors regulating it in health and disease. Real progress has been made in understanding the diseases of the pulmonary circulation and in learning to treat them. The accomplishments are impressive, particularly when seen in historical context.

Keywords: Pulmonary circulation; Gas exchange; History

Published: May 1, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Riedel M. The evolution of knowledge about the pulmonary circulation II. Twentieth century. Cor Vasa. 2003;44(5):269-274.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)

    • Return to the content


    Cor et Vasa

    You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

    I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.


    No
    Yes