Cor Vasa 2017, 59(4):e317-e324 | DOI: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.06.004

Thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation - Should we still be concerned about periprocedural complications?

Petr Budera*, Pavel Osmančík, David Talavera, Anna Kraupnerová, Vitalii Rizov, Richard Fojt, Zbyněk Straka
Kardiocentrum, 3. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha, Česká republika

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgical ablations are becoming an interesting treatment option for patients with stand-alone atrial fibrillation (AF). However, they are in general connected with higher rates of perioperative complications. The aim of this study was to summarize the complications of all such procedures performed in our center and compare them with similar recent papers.

Material and methods: All perioperative and 30-day complications of thoracoscopic ablations of AF performed in our center were collected and analyzed. Recent literature was searched for studies describing the outcomes of thoracoscopic and hybrid ablations. Rates of complications were then compared with our outcomes and also with catheter ablations.

Results: A total of 112 patients underwent a thoracoscopic ablation of AF in our center between 2006 and 2017, with use of three different devices. Mean age was 61.4 ± 8.8 years, 66% were males and 53% of patients had long-standing persistent AF. Life-threatening complications occurred in two (1.8%) patients, including one conversion to sternotomy and one stroke. Severe complications occurred in six (5.4%) patients including two re-explorations for bleeding, three cases of phrenic nerve palsy and one respiratory failure. Minor or moderate complications occurred in 17 (15.2%) patients. Twenty-seven suitable papers were identified in recent literature for comparison (total of 1 869 patients). The rates of significant complications varied between 0 and 16% over different centers, mean rate was 4.8%. Regarding the catheter ablation studies, 5-7% of patients suffer from some severe complication after ablation of AF.

Conclusions: Rates of 30-day, life-threatening and severe complications are comparable between mini-invasive surgical and catheter ablations of AF. Rates of minor complications appear to be higher in surgical ablations. To keep the rates low or even to decrease them, those surgical or hybrid procedures should be performed in experienced centers.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Complications; Hybrid ablation; Outcomes; Surgical ablation

Received: May 27, 2017; Revised: June 7, 2017; Accepted: June 8, 2017; Published: August 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Budera P, Osmančík P, Talavera D, Kraupnerová A, Rizov V, Fojt R, Straka Z. Thoracoscopic ablation of atrial fibrillation - Should we still be concerned about periprocedural complications? Cor Vasa. 2017;59(4):e317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.06.004.
Download citation

References

  1. J. Dunning, M. Nagendran, O.R. Alfieri, et al., Guideline for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 44 (2013) 777-791. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. M.C. Henn, T.S. Lancaster, J.R. Miller, et al., Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 150 (2015) 1168-1178. e2. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. P. Budera, Z. Straka, P. Osmancik, et al., Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUE-12 randomized multicentre study, European Heart Journal 33 (2012) 2644-2652. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. M.J. Mack, Current results of minimally invasive surgical ablation for isolated atrial fibrillation, Heart Rhythm 6 (2009) S46-S49. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. C. van Laar, J. Kelder, B.P. van Putte, The totally thoracoscopic maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 24 (2017) 102-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Z. Straka, P. Budera, P. Osmancik, et al., Treatment of stand-alone atrial fibrillation with a right thoracoscopic approach employing a microwave or monopolar radiofrequency energy source: long-term results, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 22 (2016) 762-768. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. A.N. Ganesan, N.J. Shipp, A.G. Brooks, et al., Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of the American Heart Association 2 (2013) e004549. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. M. Vroomen, L. Pison, Hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 47 (2016) 265-274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. L.V. Boersma, M. Castella, W. van Boven, et al., Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial, Circulation 125 (2012) 23-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. P. Kirchhof, S. Benussi, D. Kotecha, et al., 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS, European Heart Journal 37 (2016) 2893-2962 (Epub 2016 Aug 27). Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. P. Budera, P. Osmancik, D. Talavera, et al., Eight years experience with thoracoscopic surgical ablation of stand-alone atrial fibrillation in Cardiocenter Kralovske Vinohrady - the evolution of methods and indications and summary of the results, Cor et Vasa 57 (2015) e133-e138. Go to original source...
  12. G. Bisleri, F. Rosati, L. Bontempi, et al., Hybrid approach for the treatment of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: electrophysiological findings and clinical results, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 44 (2013) 919-923. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. A. Bulava, A. Mokracek, J. Hanis, et al., Sequential hybrid procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation, Journal of the American Heart Association 4 (2015) e001754. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. A.K. Gehi, J.P. Mounsey, I. Pursell, et al., Hybrid epicardial-endocardial ablation using a pericardioscopic technique for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, Heart Rhythm 10 (2013) 22-28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. B. Gersak, A. Pernat, B. Robic, et al., Low rate of atrial fibrillation recurrence verified by implantable loop recorder monitoring following a convergent epicardial and endocardial ablation of atrial fibrillation, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 23 (2012) 1059-1066. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. S.P. Krul, A.H. Driessen, W.J. van Boven, et al., Thoracoscopic video-assisted pulmonary vein antrum isolation, ganglionated plexus ablation, and periprocedural confirmation of ablation lesions: first results of a hybrid surgical-electrophysiological approach for atrial fibrillation, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 4 (2011) 262-270. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. M. La Meir, S. Gelsomino, R. Lorusso, et al., The hybrid approach for the surgical treatment of lone atrial fibrillation: one-year results employing a monopolar radiofrequency source, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 7 (2012) 71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. S. Mahapatra, D.J. LaPar, S. Kamath, et al., Initial experience of sequential surgical epicardial-catheter endocardial ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation with long-term follow-up, Annals of Thoracic Surgery 91 (2011) 1890-1898. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. C. Muneretto, G. Bisleri, L. Bontempi, et al., Durable staged hybrid ablation with thoracoscopic and percutaneous approach for treatment of long-standing atrial fibrillation: a 30-month assessment with continuous monitoring, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 144 (2012) 1460-1465. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. L. Pison, S. Gelsomino, F. Lucà, et al., Effectiveness and safety of simultaneous hybrid thoracoscopic and endocardial catheter ablation of lone atrial fibrillation, Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery 3 (2014) 38-44.
  21. T.D. Richardson, M.B. Shoemaker, S.P. Whalen, et al., Staged versus simultaneous thoracoscopic hybrid ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation does not affect time to recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 27 (2016) 428-434. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. M. Zembala, K. Filipiak, O. Kowalski, et al., Staged hybrid ablation for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation effectively restores sinus rhythm in long-term observation, Archives of Medical Science 13 (2017) 109-117. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. L.V. Boersma, M. Castella, W. Van Boven, et al., Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial, Circulation 125 (2012) 23-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. E. Pokushalov, A. Romanov, D. Elesin, et al., Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 24 (2013) 1338-1343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. E. Abo-Salem, R.F. Paone, K. Nugent, et al., Stand alone surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation, Journal of Cardiac Surgery 28 (2013) 315-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. G.S. Geuzebroek, M. Bentala, S.G. Molhoek, et al., Totally thoracoscopic left atrial maze: standardized, effective and safe, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 22 (2016) 259-264. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. J.H. Sirak, D. Schwartzman, Interim results of the 5-box thoracoscopic maze procedure, Annals of Thoracic Surgery 94 (2012) 1880-1884. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. G.E. De Maat, A. Pozzoli, M.F. Scholten, et al., Long-term results of surgical minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal lone atrial fibrillation, Europace 17 (2015) 747-752. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Q.-M. Hu, Y. Li, C-L. Xu, et al., Analysis of risk factors for recurrence after video-assisted pulmonary vein isolation of lone atrial fibrillation - results of 5 years of follow-up, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 148 (2014) 2174-2180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. J.H. Ip, M. Viqar-Syed, D. Grimes, et al., Surveillance of AF recurrence post-surgical AF ablation using implantable cardiac monitor, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 33 (2012) 77-83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. V. Kasirajan, E.A. Spradlin, T.E. Mormando, et al., Minimally invasive surgery using bipolar radiofrequency energy is effective treatment for refractory atrial fibrillation, Annals of Thoracic Surgery 93 (2012) 1456-1461. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. M. Pojar, J. Vojacek, L. Haman, et al., Thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation for lone atrial fibrillation: boxlesion technique, Journal of Cardiac Surgery 29 (2014) 757-762. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. J.G. Wang, M. Xin, J. Han, et al., Ablation in selective patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: medium-term results of the Dallas lesion set, European Journal of CardioThoracic Surgery 46 (2014) 213-220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. T. Weimar, M. Vosseler, M. Czesla, et al., Approaching a paradigm shift: endoscopic ablation of lone atrial fibrillation on the beating heart, Annals of Thoracic Surgery 94 (2012) 1886-1892. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. S. Zheng, Y. Li, J. Han, et al., Long-term results of a minimally invasive surgical pulmonary vein isolation and ganglionic plexi ablation for atrial fibrillation, PLOS ONE 8 (2013) 1-8. Go to original source...
  36. C. de Asmundis, G.B. Chierchia, G. Mugnai, et al., Midterm clinical outcomes of concomitant thoracoscopic epicardial and transcatheter endocardial ablation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a single-centre experience, Europace 19 (2017) 58-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. V. Janusauskas, L. Puodziukaite, V.V. Maneikiene, et al., Long-term results of minimally invasive stand-alone bi-atrial surgical ablation with a bipolar ablation device for persistent and longstanding persistent AF: a single-center case series of 91 patients, Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 11 (2016) 23. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. J. Probst, L. Jidéus, P. Blomström, et al., Thoracoscopic epicardial left atrial ablation in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation, Europace 18 (2016) 1538-1544. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. P. Budera, P. Osmancik, D. Herman, et al., Risk of intraatrial thrombi after thoracoscopic ablation in absence of heparin and appendage closure, Annals of Thoracic Surgery (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.01.113, pii: S0003-4975(17)30250-3. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. P. Osmancik, P. Budera, The future of hybrid ablation: an emerging need for an anticoagulation protocol for thoracoscopic ablation, Journal of Thoracic Disease 9 (2017) E322-E326. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. A.J. Deshmukh, X. Yao, S. Schilz, et al., Pacemaker implantation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 45 (2016) 99-105. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Cor et Vasa

You are accessing a site intended for medical professionals, not the lay public. The site may also contain information that is intended only for persons authorized to prescribe and dispense medicinal products for human use.

I therefore confirm that I am a healthcare professional under Act 40/1995 Coll. as amended by later regulations and that I have read the definition of a healthcare professional.